Burchardi H, Schuster H P, Zielmann S
Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Universität Göttingen, Germany.
New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):364-74.
The German healthcare system offers a social network guaranteeing almost complete healthcare coverage to the German population (prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation). The system is supported by a multistructured network of public and private healthcare insurers. Fees for public insurance are equally paid by employers and employees. Healthcare expenditures heavily impact the salary levels of employees and, as a result, production costs of employers. About one third of all national healthcare spending goes to hospital care. In 1991, there were ICUs in half of all German hospitals; 3.2% of all hospital beds were ICU beds. As in most countries, the expansion in national healthcare costs in the last decade has become a serious problem in Germany. At total of 8.1% of the entire German gross national product is spent on health care, which has led to drastic governmental healthcare reform that began in 1993. The key points of this reform are: a) strict limitations on hospital budgets at 1992 levels including a new structure of hospital financing; b) controlled reduction of expenditures for medical drugs (which were formerly at the highest level in Europe); and c) controlled restriction of regional distribution for physicians. In a large German university hospital (1,461 beds; 91 ICU beds) expenses for intensive care medicine comprise about 12% of all hospital spending (5,356 deutsche mark/patient). More than 60% of these expenses are for personnel; 37% go toward drugs and medical materials. There are several possible starting points for cost containment in intensive care medicine in Germany: a) a task-adapted, countrywide diffusion of ICUs within the different levels of hospitals; b) a more selective provision of intensive care medicine (primary as well as secondary) to patients, depending on patient needs; c) a centralized and task-oriented admission and discharge policy; and d) cost containment in the use of drug therapy by centralized hospital purchasing and by establishing strict, rational, therapeutic principles. Some examples of the author's personal experience follow. In all German hospitals, expenses for personnel are about 60% to 70%. These expenses are fixed by official, standard wages. Cost containment by further restricting the number of personnel impairs the care provided. Improvements in organization and management may contribute to a higher degree of personal motivation for employees and, in turn, may result in higher working efficiency.
德国医疗保健系统提供了一个社会网络,为德国民众保障了几乎全面的医疗保健覆盖(预防、治疗和康复)。该系统由一个公私医疗保险公司的多层次网络提供支持。公共保险费用由雇主和雇员平均分担。医疗保健支出对雇员的薪资水平有重大影响,进而影响雇主的生产成本。全国医疗保健支出中约有三分之一用于医院护理。1991年,德国半数医院设有重症监护病房;所有医院床位的3.2%是重症监护病床。与大多数国家一样,过去十年德国全国医疗保健成本的增长已成为一个严重问题。德国医疗保健支出占整个国民生产总值的8.1%,这导致了1993年开始的大规模政府医疗保健改革。这次改革的要点包括:a)将医院预算严格限制在1992年的水平,包括医院融资的新结构;b)有控制地削减药品支出(德国此前药品支出在欧洲处于最高水平);c)有控制地限制医生的地区分布。在一家大型德国大学医院(1461张床位;91张重症监护病床),重症监护医学的费用约占医院总支出的12%(每位患者5356德国马克)。这些费用中超过60%用于人员;37%用于药品和医疗材料。在德国,重症监护医学中有几个控制成本的可能切入点:a)在不同层级医院中根据任务适配、在全国范围内推广重症监护病房;b)根据患者需求,更有选择性地为患者提供重症监护医学(一级和二级);c)实行集中且以任务为导向的收治和出院政策;d)通过医院集中采购以及制定严格、合理的治疗原则来控制药物治疗的成本。以下是作者个人经历的一些例子。在所有德国医院中,人员费用约占60%至70%。这些费用由官方标准工资确定。通过进一步限制人员数量来控制成本会损害所提供的护理。组织和管理方面的改进可能会提高员工的个人积极性,进而可能带来更高的工作效率。