Suppr超能文献

生物医学研究方案中的道德推理。

Moral reasoning in biomedical research protocols.

作者信息

Holm S

机构信息

Institute of Biostatistics and Theory of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Soc Med. 1994 Jun;22(2):81-5. doi: 10.1177/140349489402200201.

Abstract

An analysis was performed of the ethics section in 134 biomedical research protocols submitted for review to a Danish Research Ethical Committee (REC) in 1990. The statements made in the ethics sections were identified and classified. It was found that 20% of the protocols lack an ethics section despite a specific requirement for such a section in the Helsinki-II declaration and the guidelines issued by the REC. The ethics sections have a median length of 6 lines of text and contain a median of 3 ethically relevant statements, thereby comprising 1.13% of the total research protocol. An analysis of the statements made show that 32% are purely formal and 30% are concerned with the area of information, consent and voluntariness. The remaining 38% are spread over a wide range of considerations. It is hypothesized that this relatively meager result reflects the researchers perception of the research review procedure as a mostly formal procedure.

摘要

对1990年提交给丹麦研究伦理委员会(REC)进行审查的134份生物医学研究方案中的伦理部分进行了分析。对伦理部分所做的陈述进行了识别和分类。结果发现,尽管《赫尔辛基宣言II》和REC发布的指南对该部分有具体要求,但仍有20%的方案缺少伦理部分。伦理部分的文本中位数长度为6行,包含的伦理相关陈述中位数为3条,占整个研究方案的1.13%。对所做陈述的分析表明,32%是纯粹形式上的,30%涉及信息、同意和自愿性领域。其余38%分布在广泛的考量范围内。据推测,这一相对微薄的结果反映了研究人员将研究审查程序视为主要是形式上的程序的看法。

相似文献

1
Moral reasoning in biomedical research protocols.生物医学研究方案中的道德推理。
Scand J Soc Med. 1994 Jun;22(2):81-5. doi: 10.1177/140349489402200201.
2
The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.伦理审查委员会的结构与运作。
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1791-800. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90273-8.
3
Informed consent: the intricacies.知情同意:错综复杂之处。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1059-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1059.
7
Ethical considerations in treatment and research in spinal injuries.
Paraplegia. 1975 Feb;12(4):242-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.1974.38.
8
Local research ethics committees.当地研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验