McNeill P M, Berglund C A, Webster I W
School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90028-o.
We sought researchers' views on the ethics of research practice and the Australian system of review of research proposals by research ethics committees (RECs). Researchers were found to be supportive of review of research proposals, even though they thought that the process of review was time consuming and demanding. However, our findings suggest that not all researchers present their research proposals for review by committees, and that some researchers deviate from their approved proposals without seeking approval for those deviations from an REC. Researchers supported monitoring of research by RECs.
我们探寻了研究人员对于研究实践伦理以及澳大利亚研究伦理委员会(RECs)对研究提案的审查体系的看法。结果发现,研究人员支持对研究提案进行审查,尽管他们认为审查过程既耗时又费力。然而,我们的研究结果表明,并非所有研究人员都会将其研究提案提交给委员会进行审查,而且一些研究人员在未就这些偏差寻求研究伦理委员会批准的情况下偏离了其获批的提案。研究人员支持研究伦理委员会对研究进行监督。