• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用复合树脂或玻璃离子水门汀粘结的烤瓷嵌体的三年比较

Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement.

作者信息

Aberg C H, van Dijken J W, Olofsson A L

机构信息

Department of Cariology, Dental School, Umeå University, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Jun;52(3):140-9. doi: 10.3109/00016359409027588.

DOI:10.3109/00016359409027588
PMID:8091960
Abstract

Ceramic inlays offer a good alternative to posterior composites, which still show a high polymerization shrinkage. The thin cement layer will reduce the total amount of shrinkage and probably result in a better marginal adaptation and decreased marginal leakage. Fired feldspathic ceramic inlays cemented with either a glass ionomer cement or a dual-cured composite resin luting cement were compared intraindividually. During a 3-year period 118 inlays, 59 in each group, were examined. Eleven inlays were evaluated as non-acceptable during the period: two (3.4%) in the composite resin group and nine (15.3%) in the glass ionomer cement group. In the composite group one inlay fractured partially and one inlay was replaced because of postoperative sensitivity. In the glass ionomer group four inlays were totally lost, and partial fractures occurred in five inlays. In the fractured glass ionomer cemented inlays the cement was still in place in the cavities. Eight patients reported post-operative sensitivity. No secondary caries was detected around the inlays even though 46% of the patients were considered high caries risk patients.

摘要

陶瓷嵌体为后牙复合树脂提供了一个很好的替代方案,后牙复合树脂仍表现出较高的聚合收缩率。较薄的粘结剂层将减少收缩总量,并可能导致更好的边缘适应性和减少边缘微渗漏。对分别用玻璃离子水门汀或双固化复合树脂粘结剂粘结的烤瓷长石质陶瓷嵌体进行了个体内比较。在3年期间,对118个嵌体进行了检查,每组59个。在此期间,有11个嵌体被评估为不合格:复合树脂组中有2个(3.4%),玻璃离子水门汀组中有9个(15.3%)。在复合树脂组中,有1个嵌体部分折断,1个嵌体因术后敏感而被替换。在玻璃离子水门汀组中,有4个嵌体完全脱落,5个嵌体发生部分折断。在折断的玻璃离子水门汀粘结嵌体中,粘结剂仍留在窝洞内。8名患者报告有术后敏感症状。尽管46%的患者被认为是高龋风险患者,但在嵌体周围未检测到继发龋。

相似文献

1
Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement.使用复合树脂或玻璃离子水门汀粘结的烤瓷嵌体的三年比较
Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Jun;52(3):140-9. doi: 10.3109/00016359409027588.
2
A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study.粘结式陶瓷嵌体的临床评估。一项为期两年的随访研究。
Swed Dent J. 1992;16(4):169-71.
3
Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Nov;82(5):529-35. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70051-x.
4
Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite.使用玻璃聚烯烃酸酯(聚羧酸锌)水门汀或树脂复合材料粘结的烤瓷嵌体边缘破损情况。
J Dent. 1994 Oct;22(5):265-72. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90055-8.
5
A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Dec;52(6):368-76. doi: 10.3109/00016359409029034.
6
One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth.后牙复合树脂嵌体和陶瓷嵌体的一年临床评估
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):410-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70004-6.
7
In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results.长石质陶瓷系统的体内评估:2年结果。
J Dent. 1996 Jan-Mar;24(1-2):25-31. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00053-4.
8
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与自固化树脂复合材料粘结的陶瓷嵌体。一项为期5年的临床评估。
Dent Mater. 2003 Nov;19(7):670-4. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00011-3.
9
Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays.复合树脂和陶瓷嵌体粘结过程中粘结树脂产生的应力。
J Oral Rehabil. 1992 Mar;19(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01088.x.
10
The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.不同粘结剂对全瓷冠和纤维增强冠的抗折性及边缘适合性的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):538-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review.玻璃陶瓷后牙修复体的黏固:一项系统评价
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:148954. doi: 10.1155/2015/148954. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
2
Systematic review of ceramic inlays.陶瓷嵌体的系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):8-19. doi: 10.1007/s00784-002-0186-z. Epub 2002 Dec 21.
3
All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing?全瓷冠:粘结还是粘固?
Clin Oral Investig. 2002 Dec;6(4):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s00784-002-0183-2. Epub 2002 Nov 21.
4
What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.哪种补牙材料?牙齿修复的最佳实践。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):202-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.202.