Shils M E
Department of Public Health Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Oct;60(4):631-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/60.4.631.
The criteria usually used for evaluating the state of nutrition education in our medical schools include the numbers of schools with required nutrition courses, attendance at nutrition electives, student satisfaction with their nutrition teaching, and the number of postgraduate clinical nutrition programs. These criteria indicate either no change or actual decreases over the years. More important, barriers persist that exclude essential nutrition education for all students in the clinical years. This pessimistic evaluation is tempered by events that, if properly addressed, may lead to improvement. Changes in the traditional medical curriculum are occurring in an increasing number of schools. More curriculum planning, execution, and oversight by interdepartmental faculty (problem-based and small-group learning); a greater emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention; and expansion of primary care offer the potential for more emphasis on nutrition education. This will not happen automatically but requires a vigorous effort by the Society and its members to become involved in the reform movement.
我们医学院校通常用于评估营养教育状况的标准包括开设必修营养课程的学校数量、营养选修课的出勤率、学生对营养教学的满意度以及研究生临床营养项目的数量。这些标准显示,多年来要么没有变化,要么实际上在下降。更重要的是,阻碍依然存在,使得临床阶段的所有学生都无法接受必要的营养教育。不过,如果能妥善应对一些事件,这种悲观的评估情况可能会得到改善。越来越多的学校正在对传统医学课程进行改革。跨部门教师进行更多的课程规划、实施和监督(基于问题的学习和小组学习);更加注重健康促进和疾病预防;以及扩大初级保健,这些都为更加强调营养教育提供了可能。但这不会自动实现,而是需要协会及其成员积极努力,参与到改革运动中来。