Weeks W B, Kofoed L L, Wallace A E, Welch H G
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 26;154(18):2077-83.
It has been assumed that patients using advance directives would direct terminal care away from the intensive care unit and choose shorter, less costly, less technological terminal hospital stays.
This retrospective cohort study examined 336 consecutive patients who died in a university tertiary care medical center: 242 without advance directives, 66 with a previously completed advance directive, 13 admitted for the express purpose of terminal care, and 15 who signed an advance directive during their terminal hospitalization. Total charges (hospital and physician) were calculated for all patients and were adjusted using both physician and hospital diagnosis-related group weights. Patient participation in end-of-life decisions was determined by chart review.
The group without advance directives had dramatically higher mean total ($49,900 vs $31,200) terminal hospitalization charges than the group with previously completed advance directives, producing a charge ratio of 1.6. After diagnosis-related group adjustment, the charge ratio was 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.72) for physician charge, 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.74) for hospital charge, and 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.73) for total charge. Multiple regression analysis controlling for age, sex, and cancer diagnosis confirmed these findings. Patients with advance directives were significantly more likely to limit treatment and to participate in end-of-life decisions.
Patients without advance directives have significantly higher terminal hospitalization charges than those with advance directives. Our investigation suggests that the preferences of patients with advance directives are to limit care and these preferences influence the cost of terminal hospitalization.
一直以来人们认为,使用预立医嘱的患者会将终末期护理从重症监护病房转出,并选择在医院接受时间更短、费用更低、技术含量更少的终末期治疗。
这项回顾性队列研究调查了一所大学三级医疗中心连续死亡的336例患者:242例没有预立医嘱,66例有之前已完成的预立医嘱,13例因终末期护理的明确目的入院,15例在终末期住院期间签署了预立医嘱。计算了所有患者的总费用(医院和医生费用),并使用医生和医院诊断相关分组权重进行调整。通过病历审查确定患者参与临终决策的情况。
没有预立医嘱的患者组终末期住院平均总费用(49,900美元对31,200美元)显著高于有之前已完成预立医嘱的患者组,费用比为1.6。经诊断相关分组调整后,医生费用的费用比为1.35(95%置信区间,1.07至1.72),医院费用的费用比为1.36(95%置信区间,1.06至1.74),总费用的费用比为1.35(95%置信区间,1.08至1.73)。控制年龄、性别和癌症诊断的多元回归分析证实了这些结果。有预立医嘱的患者更有可能限制治疗并参与临终决策。
没有预立医嘱的患者终末期住院费用显著高于有预立医嘱的患者。我们的调查表明,有预立医嘱的患者的偏好是限制护理,这些偏好会影响终末期住院费用。