Suppr超能文献

大鼠体内炎症介质皮内和皮下痛觉过敏效应的比较。

Comparison of intradermal and subcutaneous hyperalgesic effects of inflammatory mediators in the rat.

作者信息

Khasar S G, Green P G, Levine J D

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 1993 Apr 30;153(2):215-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90325-f.

Abstract

In recent studies, the superfusion of the corium side of the skin with inflammatory mediators failed to produce sensitization of nociceptors to mechanical stimuli. We have studied the effects of intradermal (i.d.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and bradykinin (BK) in a behavioral model of hyperalgesia. PGE2 or BK was injected into the rat hind-paw, and paw-withdrawal thresholds in response to noxious mechanical stimulation before and after the drug were compared. Subcutaneous injection of PGE2 (1-1000 ng), a hyperalgesic inflammatory mediator, did not significantly alter paw-withdrawal thresholds, under the same conditions in which i.d. injections dose-dependently lowered paw-withdrawal thresholds. Similarly, BK (1-1000 ng), another hyperalgesic mediator, given s.c. failed to significantly alter paw-withdrawal thresholds while i.d. injections dose-dependently lowered paw-withdrawal thresholds. The prostaglandin E-type, EP1 receptor antagonist SC19220 (750 ng), given s.c. prior to PGE2 (i.d.) did not significantly change PGE2-induced hyperalgesia. However, SC19220 significantly attenuated PGE2 hyperalgesia when both were injected i.d. Also, s.c. administration of the mu-opioid antagonist, DAMGO, before PGE2 did not inhibit PGE2-induced hyperalgesia as opposed to i.d. injection. These results suggest that the inability of s.c. injection of PGE2 or BK to reach its receptor site on the terminals of primary afferent nociceptors may be responsible for the ineffectiveness of these hyperalgesic mediators to sensitize cutaneous nociceptors to mechanical stimuli in the rat and underscore the importance of the site of application and site of action of hyperalgesic agents in the study of hyperalgesic mechanisms.

摘要

在最近的研究中,用炎性介质对皮肤真皮侧进行超灌注未能使伤害感受器对机械刺激产生致敏作用。我们在痛觉过敏的行为模型中研究了皮内(i.d.)和皮下(s.c.)注射前列腺素E2(PGE2)和缓激肽(BK)的作用。将PGE2或BK注射到大鼠后爪中,并比较给药前后对有害机械刺激的爪退缩阈值。皮下注射痛觉过敏炎性介质PGE2(1 - 1000 ng)在皮内注射剂量依赖性降低爪退缩阈值的相同条件下,并未显著改变爪退缩阈值。同样,另一种痛觉过敏介质BK(1 - 1000 ng)皮下给药未能显著改变爪退缩阈值,而皮内注射则剂量依赖性降低爪退缩阈值。在皮内注射PGE2之前皮下注射前列腺素E型EP1受体拮抗剂SC19220(750 ng)并未显著改变PGE2诱导的痛觉过敏。然而,当两者都皮内注射时,SC19220显著减轻了PGE2诱导的痛觉过敏。此外,与皮内注射相反,在PGE2之前皮下给予μ - 阿片受体拮抗剂DAMGO并未抑制PGE2诱导的痛觉过敏。这些结果表明,皮下注射PGE2或BK无法到达初级传入伤害感受器终末上的受体部位可能是这些痛觉过敏介质在大鼠中无法使皮肤伤害感受器对机械刺激致敏的原因,并强调了痛觉过敏剂的应用部位和作用部位在痛觉过敏机制研究中的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验