• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卒中单元能挽救生命吗?

Do stroke units save lives?

作者信息

Langhorne P, Williams B O, Gilchrist W, Howie K

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 1993 Aug 14;342(8868):395-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92813-9.

DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92813-9
PMID:8101901
Abstract

Management of stroke patients in specialist stroke units hastens recovery but is not believed to influence mortality. We did a statistical overview of randomised controlled trials reported between 1962 and 1993 in which the management of stroke patients in a specialist unit was compared with that in general wards. We identified 10 trials, 8 of which used a strict randomisation procedure. 1586 stroke patients were included; 766 were allocated to a stroke unit and 820 to general wards. The odds ratio (stroke unit vs general wards) for mortality within the first 4 months (median follow-up 3 months) after the stroke was 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.92), consistent with a reduction in mortality of 28% (2p < 0.01). This reduction persisted (odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, 2p < 0.05) when calculated for mortality during the first 12 months. The findings were not significantly altered if the analysis was limited to studies that used a formal randomisation procedure. We conclude that management of stroke patients in a stroke unit is associated with a sustained reduction in mortality.

摘要

在专业卒中单元对卒中患者进行管理可加速康复,但一般认为不会影响死亡率。我们对1962年至1993年期间报告的随机对照试验进行了统计学综述,其中对专业卒中单元与普通病房中卒中患者的管理进行了比较。我们确定了10项试验,其中8项采用了严格的随机程序。共纳入1586例卒中患者;766例被分配到卒中单元,820例被分配到普通病房。卒中后前4个月(中位随访3个月)内死亡的比值比(卒中单元与普通病房相比)为0.72(95%可信区间0.56 - 0.92),这与死亡率降低28%一致(P<0.01)。计算卒中后前12个月的死亡率时,这种降低仍然存在(比值比0.79,95%可信区间0.63 - 0.99,P<0.05)。如果将分析局限于采用正式随机程序的研究,结果无显著改变。我们得出结论,在卒中单元对卒中患者进行管理可使死亡率持续降低。

相似文献

1
Do stroke units save lives?卒中单元能挽救生命吗?
Lancet. 1993 Aug 14;342(8868):395-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92813-9.
2
A formal overview of stroke unit trials.
Rev Neurol. 1995 Mar-Apr;23(120):394-8.
3
Randomized controlled study of stroke unit care versus stroke team care in different stroke subtypes.不同卒中亚型中卒中单元护理与卒中团队护理的随机对照研究。
Stroke. 2002 Feb;33(2):449-55. doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102364.
4
Stroke unit treatment. Long-term effects.卒中单元治疗。长期影响。
Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1861-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1861.
5
Stroke units versus general medical wards, I: twelve- and eighteen-month survival: a randomized, controlled trial.卒中单元与普通内科病房,I:12个月和18个月生存率:一项随机对照试验。
Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):58-62. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.1.58.
6
[The treatment of stroke in internal medicine wards or in an intensive care unit?].
Recenti Prog Med. 1999 Mar;90(3):143-6.
7
Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration.卒中后有组织的住院(卒中单元)护理随机试验的协作系统评价。卒中单元试验协作组。
BMJ. 1997 Apr 19;314(7088):1151-9.
8
A randomised controlled comparison of alternative strategies in stroke care.中风护理中替代策略的随机对照比较。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(18):iii-iv, 1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta9180.
9
Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial.
Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):1026-31. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.1026.
10
The influence of stroke unit rehabilitation on functional recovery from stroke.
Stroke. 1994 Apr;25(4):821-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.4.821.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Stroke Units Nested within Broader Neurology: Care Bundles for Nursing to Enhance Competence and Interdisciplinary Coordination.嵌套于更广泛神经科的急性卒中单元:护理的综合干预措施以提高能力和跨学科协作。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11910-025-01409-7.
2
Stroke in Brazil: prevalence, activity limitations, access to healthcare, and physiotherapeutic treatment.巴西的中风:患病率、活动受限情况、医疗保健可及性及物理治疗
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Dec;82(12):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792094. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission.
减少全球卒中负担的务实解决方案:世界卒中组织-柳叶刀神经病学委员会。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Dec;22(12):1160-1206. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Medical-evidence giant Cochrane battles funding cuts and closures.
Nature. 2023 Sep;621(7977):13-14. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02741-z.
5
National Patterns and Outcomes of Neurologist Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中神经内科医生诊疗的全国模式与结果
Neurohospitalist. 2023 Jan;13(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/19418744221129428. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
6
The role of neuroimaging in acute stroke.神经影像学在急性卒中中的作用。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2008 Jan;11(Suppl 1):S12-S23.
7
Grace Under Pressure: Resiliency of Quality Monitoring of Stroke Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Mexico City.压力下的从容:墨西哥城新冠疫情期间中风护理质量监测的韧性
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 6;13:831735. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.831735. eCollection 2022.
8
Improving stroke care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a population-based project spanning 14 years.改善加拿大新斯科舍省的中风护理:一项跨越 14 年的基于人群的项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Sep;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001368.
9
Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?急性中风生物标志物:我们做到了吗?
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 5;12:619721. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.619721. eCollection 2021.
10
A Proposal for Multidisciplinary Tele-Rehabilitation in the Assessment and Rehabilitation of COVID-19 Survivors.《关于 COVID-19 幸存者评估和康复的多学科远程康复建议》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 7;17(13):4890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134890.