Rowinsky E K, Eisenhauer E A, Chaudhry V, Arbuck S G, Donehower R C
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Division of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Baltimore, MD 21287-8934.
Semin Oncol. 1993 Aug;20(4 Suppl 3):1-15.
Although paclitaxel (TAXOL) appears to be one of the most promising antineoplastic agents of the last decade, with demonstrated activity in advanced and refractory ovarian, breast, lung, and head and neck cancers, most clinical oncologists have had little experience with the agent. This is largely the result of the initially limited supply of paclitaxel and other obstacles encountered during early clinical development that restricted the drug's availability to a few investigational centers. Although a high incidence of major hypersensitivity reactions due to the Cremophor EL vehicle used in formulation disrupted and almost terminated the clinical development of paclitaxel, hypersensitivity reactions are no longer a serious problem consequent to the advent of effective premedication regimens and longer administration schemes. Instead, neutropenia is the principal toxicity of paclitaxel. At clinically relevant doses, absolute neutrophil count nadirs are severely depressed in most patients. The duration of severe neutropenia, however, is usually brief; treatment delays for unresolved hematologic toxicity are rare, and absolute neutrophil count nadirs are constant with repetitive dosing, suggesting that neutropenia is not cumulative. Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia has occurred in up to 29% of patients in phase II trials, and other cardiac disturbances, including atrioventricular conduction and bundle branch blocks, ventricular tachycardia, and possible ischemic manifestations, have been reported in approximately 3% of patients. Cardiac disturbances have primarily been noted in studies that used cardiac monitoring to more effectively detect and manage major hypersensitivity reactions. Although sinus bradycardia and conduction blocks appear to represent true toxicities, ventricular tachycardia and ischemic manifestations, which have largely been observed in patients with preexisting cardiac disease, may not be due to paclitaxel. In view of the lack of clinical significance of the cardiac effects and their infrequent occurrence, cardiac monitoring during paclitaxel is not recommended for patients without cardiac risk factors. However, until precise risk factors can be defined, patients with a significant antecedent cardiac history are generally not considered to be good candidates for paclitaxel therapy. Neurotoxicity, characterized principally by peripheral neurosensory manifestations, has generally been of mild to moderate severity, even in heavily pretreated patients at paclitaxel doses < or = 200 mg/m2. However, some patients have developed a severe sensory-motor polyneuropathy at higher doses of paclitaxel (given as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin). Patients with an antecedent peripheral neuropathy or coexisting medical illnesses associated with peripheral neuropathy (such as diabetes mellitus and substantial prior alcohol use) appear to be especially prone to developing peripheral neuropathy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
尽管紫杉醇(泰素)似乎是过去十年中最有前景的抗肿瘤药物之一,已证明其对晚期及难治性卵巢癌、乳腺癌、肺癌和头颈癌有活性,但大多数临床肿瘤学家对该药物的经验有限。这主要是由于最初紫杉醇供应有限以及早期临床开发过程中遇到的其他障碍,使得该药物仅在少数研究中心可用。尽管由于制剂中使用的聚氧乙烯蓖麻油(Cremophor EL)载体导致的严重过敏反应发生率很高,扰乱并几乎终止了紫杉醇的临床开发,但由于有效的预处理方案和更长的给药方案的出现过敏反应不再是严重问题。相反,中性粒细胞减少是紫杉醇的主要毒性。在临床相关剂量下,大多数患者的绝对中性粒细胞计数最低点会严重降低。然而,严重中性粒细胞减少的持续时间通常较短;因血液学毒性未解决而导致治疗延迟的情况很少见,并且重复给药时绝对中性粒细胞计数最低点保持不变,这表明中性粒细胞减少不会累积。在II期试验中,高达29%的患者出现无症状性窦性心动过缓,约3%的患者报告有其他心脏紊乱,包括房室传导阻滞和束支传导阻滞、室性心动过速以及可能出现缺血表现。心脏紊乱主要在使用心脏监测以更有效地检测和处理严重过敏反应的研究中被注意到。尽管窦性心动过缓和传导阻滞似乎代表真正的毒性,但室性心动过速和缺血表现主要在已有心脏病的患者中观察到,可能并非由紫杉醇引起。鉴于心脏效应缺乏临床意义且发生率较低,不建议对无心脏危险因素的患者在使用紫杉醇期间进行心脏监测。然而,在能够确定确切的危险因素之前,有显著既往心脏病史的患者通常不被认为是紫杉醇治疗的合适人选。神经毒性主要表现为外周神经感觉症状,一般为轻至中度严重程度,即使是接受过大量预处理且紫杉醇剂量≤200mg/m²的患者也是如此。然而,一些患者在更高剂量的紫杉醇(单药使用或与顺铂联合使用)治疗时出现了严重的感觉运动性多发性神经病。有既往外周神经病变或与外周神经病变相关的并存疾病(如糖尿病和大量既往饮酒史)的患者似乎特别容易发生外周神经病变。(摘要截选至400字)