Barsotti O, Morrier J J, Decoret D, Benay G, Rocca J P
Laboratoire de Microbiologie Orale, UFR d'Odontologie, Lyon, France.
J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Jul;20(6):436-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00385.x.
DNA fingerprints of 28 reference strains of Actinomyces, comprising representatives of different species and serotypes, and 19 isolates recovered from 16 periodontal patients was performed. The aim was to determine the potential of the method for detecting strain differences in terms of discriminatory power and to evaluate its usefulness in the typing of Actinomyces strains for eco-epidemiological studies. Among the 17 restriction endonucleases tested, Bst EII, Pvu II and Sma I proved to be the most suitable for the genus Actinomyces restriction digest analysis. Visual comparisons of Bst EII, Pvu II and Sma I digest patterns of chromosomal DNA revealed clear differences within species but also within serotypes of Actinomyces that are otherwise identical. The method offers the qualities for use as an epidemiological tool for identifying sources and tracing routes of transmission of Actinomyces: stability, reproducibility, ease of preparation and interpretation and enough sensitivity for detection of differences between morphologically and serologically similar strains of Actinomyces.
对28株放线菌参考菌株进行了DNA指纹分析,这些菌株包括不同种和血清型的代表菌株,同时还对从16名牙周病患者中分离出的19株菌株进行了分析。目的是确定该方法在鉴别能力方面检测菌株差异的潜力,并评估其在放线菌菌株分型用于生态流行病学研究中的实用性。在测试的17种限制性内切酶中,Bst EII、Pvu II和Sma I被证明最适合用于放线菌属的限制性消化分析。对染色体DNA的Bst EII、Pvu II和Sma I消化模式进行视觉比较,结果显示在放线菌的种内以及其他方面相同的血清型内都存在明显差异。该方法具备用作流行病学工具来识别放线菌来源和追踪传播途径的特性:稳定性、可重复性、易于制备和解读,以及对检测形态学和血清学相似的放线菌菌株之间的差异具有足够的敏感性。