Hasser E M, Bishop V S
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.
Am J Physiol. 1993 Aug;265(2 Pt 2):H530-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.2.H530.
This study evaluated the role of catecholamines in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) on the inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) due to direct electrical stimulation of the area postrema. In addition, the effects of catecholaminergic mechanisms in the NTS on the ability of circulating arginine vasopressin (AVP) to modulate arterial baroreflex control of RSNA were evaluated. Electrical stimulation of the area postrema (15 microA, 0.3 ms, 5-80 Hz) produced progressive decreases in RSNA. Responses to area postrema activation were not altered by microinjection of the alpha 1-adrenergic antagonist, prazosin, or vehicle bilaterally into the NTS. Microinjection of the alpha 2-antagonist, yohimbine (4 injections of 20-40 nl, 1 ng/nl), unilaterally into the NTS significantly attenuated the RSNA response to area postrema stimulation. Bilateral injection of yohimbine into the NTS abolished the response to area postrema activation (P < 0.05). Baroreflex inhibition of RSNA was significantly greater during infusion of AVP than during infusion of phenylephrine (slopes = -5.18 +/- 0.39 and -2.64 +/- 0.27 for AVP and phenylephrine, respectively). Microinjection of yohimbine bilaterally into the NTS did not alter the slope of baroreflex control of RSNA for phenylephrine but normalized the slope for AVP (-2.85 +/- 0.54) to that of phenylephrine. Data are consistent with the hypothesis that AVP effects on baroreflex inhibition of RSNA and area postrema-mediated inhibition of RSNA require alpha 2-adrenergic signaling within the NTS.
本研究评估了孤束核(NTS)中儿茶酚胺在因直接电刺激最后区而抑制肾交感神经活动(RSNA)方面的作用。此外,还评估了NTS中儿茶酚胺能机制对循环精氨酸加压素(AVP)调节RSNA的动脉压力反射控制能力的影响。电刺激最后区(15微安,0.3毫秒,5 - 80赫兹)使RSNA逐渐降低。向NTS双侧微量注射α1肾上腺素能拮抗剂哌唑嗪或溶媒,对最后区激活的反应未改变。向NTS单侧微量注射α2拮抗剂育亨宾(4次注射,每次20 - 40纳升,1纳克/纳升)显著减弱了RSNA对最后区刺激的反应。向NTS双侧注射育亨宾消除了对最后区激活的反应(P < 0.05)。在输注AVP期间,RSNA的压力反射抑制明显大于输注去氧肾上腺素期间(AVP和去氧肾上腺素的斜率分别为-5.18±0.39和-2.64±0.27)。向NTS双侧微量注射育亨宾并未改变去氧肾上腺素对RSNA压力反射控制的斜率,但使AVP的斜率(-2.85±0.54)恢复到去氧肾上腺素的水平。数据与以下假设一致:AVP对RSNA压力反射抑制和最后区介导的RSNA抑制的作用需要NTS内的α2肾上腺素能信号传导。