Benefits of non-selective versus cardioselective beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of current treatment with non-selective or cardioselective beta-blockers on the outcome of a first acute myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Peak aspartate aminotransferase was measured as an indirect estimate of infarct size, the occurrence of circulatory arrest from ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in-hospital mortality.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected in a continuously operating register of all hospitalized acute myocardial infarctions in Malmö, Sweden.

PATIENTS

A total of 2114 hypertensive patients were admitted to hospital with a first acute myocardial infarction. Of these patients, 323 were treated with a non-selective beta-blocker on admission and 338 with a cardioselective beta-blocker.

RESULTS

In patients given a non-selective beta-blocker the mean peak aspartate aminotransferase was 3.02 +/- 0.15 mukat/l, which was significantly lower than the peak (3.78 +/- 0.35 mukat/l) recorded in the patients given a cardioselective beta-blocker. In a multiple regression analysis, treatment with a non-selective beta-blocker was significantly and inversely related to peak aspartate aminotransferase after adjustment for several clinical characteristics. Age, anterior myocardial infarction, peak aspartate aminotransferase, serum potassium and treatment with a cardioselective beta-blocker were significantly and independently associated with the occurrence of circulatory arrest due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The relative risk of circulatory arrest in patients taking cardioselective beta-blockers was 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.16-2.58) and in patients taking non-selective beta-blockers 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.64-1.66). Advanced age, a history of diabetes mellitus, a history of stroke, anterior myocardial infarction, a high serum potassium level and a high peak aspartate aminotransferase level significantly predicted in-hospital mortality. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality in patients taking non-selective beta-blockers was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.64-1.30), and in patients taking cardioselective beta-blockers 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.59-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that current treatment with non-selective beta-blockers may have reduced the enzymatically estimated infarct size and the occurrence of circulatory arrest due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Both non-selective and cardioselective beta-blockers may also have reduced the in-hospital mortality in this population of hypertensive patients suffering a first acute myocardial infarction. In a clinical study using with adrenaline infusions in healthy volunteers, we found that beta 2-receptor blockade improved potentially arrhythmogenic variables, such as hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, but the adrenaline-induced reduction in diastolic blood pressure was reversed. Pretreatment with the new beta-blocker carvedilol preserved the beneficial electrolyte effects without increasing blood pressure during the adrenaline infusion.