Boey S K, Ong B C, Dhara S S
Department of Anaesthesia, Singapore General Hospital.
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Sep;40(9):844-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03009256.
Acute preoperative plateletpheresis has been reported to be effective in reducing blood loss and blood component transfusion while improving haematological profiles in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. However, in these studies, the concomitant use of cell saver techniques may have been responsible for the beneficial effects because they remove free haemoglobin and activated procoagulants and, therefore, could mask the deleterious effects of combined plateletpheresis and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the present study, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly divided into two groups: a control group without plateletpheresis performed, and a second group in which preoperative platelet-rich plasma 10 ml.kg-1 (PRP group) was collected and later reinfused after reversal of heparin. Standardized surgery, anaesthesia and CPB without concomitant cell saver techniques were employed. In the PRP group, blood transfusion was reduced (1.5 +/- 1.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 units, P < 0.05) but this was accompanied by lower postoperative haemoglobin concentrations. There were no differences in blood loss (992.6 +/- 327.4 vs 889.6 +/- 343.7 ml), fresh frozen plasma (2/19 vs 3/20 patients) or platelet requirements (1/19 vs 1/20 patients). Reinfusion of autologous PRP did not improve platelet count and function, nor tests of coagulation. Fibrinogen concentrations were lower in the PRP group on the operative day (P < 0.05), suggesting increased fibrinogen consumption; and more patients in the PRP group had low haptoglobin levels during CPB (8/19 vs 0/20 patients, P < 0.005), which indicated greater haemolysis in this group. We conclude that acute preoperative plateletpheresis offers no advantage in haemostasis during elective primary myocardial revascularization surgery.
据报道,急性术前血小板分离术在减少心脏直视手术患者的失血和血液成分输注方面有效,同时可改善血液学指标。然而,在这些研究中,细胞回收技术的同时使用可能是产生有益效果的原因,因为该技术可清除游离血红蛋白和活化的促凝剂,因此可能掩盖了联合血小板分离术和体外循环(CPB)的有害影响。在本研究中,40例行初次心肌血运重建术的患者被随机分为两组:一组为未进行血小板分离术的对照组,另一组为术前采集10 ml·kg-1富血小板血浆(PRP组)并在肝素逆转后回输的组。采用标准化手术、麻醉和CPB,不使用细胞回收技术。在PRP组中,输血减少(1.5±1.3单位对2.4±1.3单位,P<0.05),但术后血红蛋白浓度较低。失血量(992.6±327.4 ml对889.6±343.7 ml)、新鲜冰冻血浆(19例中的2例对20例中的3例)或血小板需求量(19例中的1例对20例中的1例)无差异。自体PRP回输并未改善血小板计数和功能,也未改善凝血检测结果。PRP组手术当天纤维蛋白原浓度较低(P<0.05),提示纤维蛋白原消耗增加;PRP组更多患者在CPB期间触珠蛋白水平较低(19例中的8例对20例中的0例,P<0.005),这表明该组溶血更严重。我们得出结论,急性术前血小板分离术在择期初次心肌血运重建手术的止血方面并无优势。