Gaunt P N
Public Health Laboratory, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 1993 Aug;24(4):291-300. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(93)90061-4.
The importance of high standards of infection control practices in intensive care units is widely accepted. Despite this, few objective measures of the efficacy of such practices have been developed. This hampers clinical audit, which is essential if nosocomial infections are to be kept to a minimum. Small sample size, multiple dependent variables, difficulty in matching populations, and the covert effects of confounding factors and bias, all add to the problems of designing meaningful audit programmes in intensive care settings. Nevertheless, useful analysis can be attempted now that appropriate standards and scoring systems are available. Computer systems can simplify data collection, analysis and reporting but they are no substitute for careful preparation and good statistical technique.
重症监护病房实施高标准感染控制措施的重要性已得到广泛认可。尽管如此,针对此类措施效果的客观衡量方法却鲜有开发。这阻碍了临床审计工作,而若要将医院感染降至最低,临床审计至关重要。样本量小、存在多个因变量、难以匹配人群以及混杂因素和偏倚的隐蔽影响,都增加了在重症监护环境中设计有意义的审计项目的难度。然而,既然已有适当的标准和评分系统,就可以尝试进行有用的分析。计算机系统可以简化数据收集、分析和报告工作,但它们无法替代精心准备和良好的统计技术。