Eisner A
R. S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97209.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 Jan;11(1):33-47. doi: 10.1364/josaa.11.000033.
This study examined the detectability of flicker for small long-wavelength foveal test stimuli centered within larger long-wavelength surround stimuli. Flicker visibility was evaluated as a function of surround and test illuminance and as a function of test wavelength, of the time elapsed following test or surround onset, and of surround dimensions. Consistent with prior flicker threshold-versus-illuminance results [Vision Res. 26, 917 (1986)], flicker threshold decreased abruptly once the surround illuminance became sufficiently great. However, as test illuminance was increased above flicker threshold, flicker again vanished. Flicker reappeared at still higher test illuminances, as middle-wavelength-sensitive (M-) cone-mediated flicker threshold was exceeded. Meanwhile, the time required for the surround to render flicker visible increased at a rapidly accelerating rate with decreasing surround illuminance; it increased at a more sporadic rate with increasing test illuminance. At bright enough surround illuminances, flicker did not vanish with increasing test illuminance. These and other results are compatible with a framework derived from previous dark-adaptation data [Vision Res. 32, 1975 (1992)]. In that framework the test stimulus itself induces losses of flicker sensitivity by sufficiently perturbing retinal response during states or stages of adaptation that fail to cause spectrally antagonistic processes to redress that perturbation adequately. The relevant adaptation processes, which can require minutes, involve an adaptation pool that includes (and is affected by) the test stimulus.
本研究考察了位于较大的长波长周边刺激中心的小长波长中央凹测试刺激的闪烁可检测性。闪烁可见度被评估为周边和测试照度的函数、测试波长的函数、测试或周边开始后经过的时间的函数以及周边尺寸的函数。与先前的闪烁阈值与照度结果[《视觉研究》。26, 917 (1986)]一致,一旦周边照度变得足够大,闪烁阈值会突然降低。然而,当测试照度增加到高于闪烁阈值时,闪烁再次消失。当超过中波长敏感(M)锥介导的闪烁阈值时,闪烁在更高的测试照度下再次出现。同时,随着周边照度降低,使闪烁可见所需的周边时间以快速加速的速率增加;随着测试照度增加,它以更零散的速率增加。在足够亮的周边照度下,闪烁不会随着测试照度增加而消失。这些以及其他结果与从先前的暗适应数据[《视觉研究》。32, 1975 (1992)]得出的框架一致。在该框架中,测试刺激本身通过在适应状态或阶段期间充分扰动视网膜反应来诱导闪烁敏感性损失,而这些适应状态或阶段未能使光谱拮抗过程充分纠正该扰动。相关的适应过程可能需要几分钟,涉及一个适应池,该适应池包括(并受)测试刺激影响。