Pratt C M, Hertz R P, Ellis B E, Crowell S P, Louv W, Moyé L
Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 15;73(5):346-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90006-x.
An observational, historical cohort evaluation was performed to examine the hypothesis that terfenadine (Seldane) exposure increases the risk of developing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The study population consisted of Medicaid recipients from 4 states that were included in the Computerized On-Line Medical Pharmaceutical Analysis and Surveillance System (COMPASS). The drug exposure period was defined prospectively as 30 days in all treatment cohorts. The primary end point was the development of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia, fibrillation and flutter, and cardiac arrest and sudden death). The comparison cohorts included terfenadine (n = 181,672), over-the-counter antihistamines (n = 150,689), ibuprofen (n = 181,672) and clemastine (Tavist; n = 83,156). Over the exposure period, a total of 317 life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events occurred, 244 of which were cardiac arrests. The incidence of total life-threatening ventricular arrhythmic events and cardiac arrests were more frequent in patients receiving over-the-counter antihistamines (relative risk 0.36) than in those receiving terfenadine, a finding that was consistent across all subgroups. There was no increased risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the terfenadine cohort as compared with the ibuprofen cohort (relative risk 0.62), and in some analyses, the ibuprofen cohort had a significantly higher arrhythmic event rate. In all comparisons with the clemastine cohort, the terfenadine cohort had a statistically indistinguishable relative risk (1.08). Age, race, sex and cardiovascular risk were all considered in the adjusted relative-risk analyses. No baseline historical characteristic or imbalance of baseline medications explained the differences between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
进行了一项观察性的历史性队列评估,以检验特非那定(息斯敏)暴露会增加发生危及生命的室性心律失常风险这一假设。研究人群包括来自4个州的医疗补助接受者,这些州被纳入计算机在线医疗药物分析和监测系统(COMPASS)。在所有治疗队列中,药物暴露期前瞻性地定义为30天。主要终点是发生危及生命的室性心律失常(室性心动过速、颤动和扑动,以及心脏骤停和猝死)。比较队列包括特非那定(n = 181,672)、非处方抗组胺药(n = 150,689)、布洛芬(n = 181,672)和氯马斯汀( Tavist;n = 83,156)。在暴露期内,共发生317起危及生命的室性心律失常事件,其中244起为心脏骤停。接受非处方抗组胺药的患者中,危及生命的室性心律失常事件和心脏骤停的总发生率比接受特非那定的患者更频繁(相对风险0.36),这一发现在所有亚组中都是一致的。与布洛芬队列相比,特非那定队列中危及生命的室性心律失常风险没有增加(相对风险0.62),并且在一些分析中,布洛芬队列的心律失常事件发生率显著更高。在与氯马斯汀队列的所有比较中,特非那定队列的相对风险在统计学上无显著差异(1.08)。在调整后的相对风险分析中考虑了年龄、种族、性别和心血管风险。没有基线历史特征或基线药物的不平衡能够解释组间差异。(摘要截断于250字)