• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[残疾统计——儿科学与青少年医学的相关方面]

[Handicapped statistics--aspects of pediatric and adolescent medicine].

作者信息

König E

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 1993 Dec;55(12):644-7.

PMID:8111162
Abstract

Disability statistics recorded so far within the framework of public health services concerning paediatric diseases and diseases of adolescents in the North German Federal Land of Sleswick-Holstein are deficient in many respects. Classification according to individual kinds of disability is lacking in clarity; statistics are not representative of the entire population; they are unsuitable for assessing the performance of public health services; it is by no means evident in what manner the data have been compiled and why; no differentiated information is given on the large group of persons threatened with disability. The article discusses various aspects of classifying disabled persons. It is not clear whether reasonable statistics on this subject will be compiled in future. Paediatricians and doctors in care of adolescents are mainly concerned with advisory and expertising activities in respect of the individual patient.

摘要

到目前为止,在德国北部石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因联邦州公共卫生服务框架内记录的有关儿科疾病和青少年疾病的残疾统计数据在很多方面存在不足。按残疾种类进行的分类缺乏清晰度;统计数据不能代表整个人口;它们不适合评估公共卫生服务的绩效;数据的汇编方式和原因根本不明确;对于面临残疾风险的一大类人群没有给出分类信息。本文讨论了对残疾人进行分类的各个方面。未来是否会编制关于这个主题的合理统计数据尚不清楚。儿科医生和青少年保健医生主要关注针对个体患者的咨询和专业指导活动。

相似文献

1
[Handicapped statistics--aspects of pediatric and adolescent medicine].[残疾统计——儿科学与青少年医学的相关方面]
Gesundheitswesen. 1993 Dec;55(12):644-7.
2
[Validity of care assessment in disabled and mentally retarded children].
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Oct;64(10):527-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34619.
3
[Comparison of expertises between long-term care insurance (SGB XI) and the law on ambulatory care for disabled individuals in Berlin (HPG)].[长期护理保险(SGB XI)与柏林残疾人门诊护理法(HPG)之间的专业知识比较]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Nov;64(11):578-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35522.
4
[Expertising according to the federal German social welfare legislation and child and adolescent welfare laws by public health offices--results of an inquiry].
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Jul;64(7):424-29. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32809.
5
[Social medicine results of expert assessment of work disability].[工作残疾专家评估的社会医学结果]
Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1989 Oct;51(10):604-7.
6
[Your severely handicapped patient gains his rights. Handicapped status: tax loophole for the common man?].[你那严重残疾的病人获得了他的权利。残疾身份:普通人的税收漏洞?]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2000 Feb 3;142(5):53-5.
7
[Expert testimony on mentally and emotionally handicapped children in relation to Paragraphs 39ff and 69 of the Federal Social Assistance code].[关于联邦社会救助法典第39条及以后条款和第69条中精神和情感障碍儿童的专家证词]
Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1984 Sep;46(9):426-9.
8
[Continuous mental disorder as a prerequisite for the loss of legal capacity].[持续性精神障碍作为丧失法律行为能力的前提条件]
Nervenarzt. 2002 Nov;73(11):1094-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1368-2.
9
[Thoughts on the problem of expert assessment of severe disability in very young children].[关于极幼儿童严重残疾专家评估问题的思考]
Gesundheitswesen. 1993 Oct;55(10):533-4.
10
[Experiences with expert assessment in guardianship law from the forensic psychiatry viewpoint].[从法医精神病学视角看监护法中的专家评估经验]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Apr;56(4):193-6.