Coldwells A, Atkinson G, Reilly T
Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University.
Ergonomics. 1994 Jan;37(1):79-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963625.
Three investigations were carried out to examine the concurrent validity and the reliability of a portable dynamometer (Takei Kiki Kogyo) for the measurement of back and leg strength. First, leg extension strength of 19 subjects was measured using the Takei dynamometer and compared to the isometric knee extension strength of the dominant (right) leg measured using a computer-controlled dynamometer (Lido Active, Davis, CA). The back extension strength of 18 subjects was also compared between the two dynamometers. Second, back and leg strengths of 36 subjects, aged 19-30 years, were measured twice using the Takei dynamometer. Six days separated the test and retest. Third, back and leg strengths of four subjects, aged 21-30 years, were measured at six different times of the solar day. Significant relations (p < 0.001) were obtained between the Takei and Lido dynamometers for leg strength (r = 0.90) and back strength (r = 0.79). Significant test-retest correlations (p < 0.001) were found for leg strength (r = 0.80) and back strength (r = 0.91). Group mean (+/- SD) leg strength values of test (1450.4 +/- 428.6 N) and retest (1432.8 +/- 449.1 N) did not differ ((p > 0.05). A small (4.5%) but significant difference was found between the test (1057.2 +/- 309.9 N) and retest (1106.2 +/- 334.4 N) mean values for back strength (p < 0.05). A time of day effect was evident for back and leg strength (p < 0.05); on average the peak times occurred at 16:53 h and 18:20 h, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
进行了三项调查,以检验便携式测力计(竹井器械工业株式会社生产)测量背部和腿部力量的同时效度和信度。首先,使用竹井测力计测量了19名受试者的腿部伸展力量,并将其与使用计算机控制测力计(加利福尼亚州戴维斯市的Lido Active)测量的优势(右)腿等长膝关节伸展力量进行比较。还比较了18名受试者在两种测力计上的背部伸展力量。其次,使用竹井测力计对36名年龄在19至30岁之间的受试者的背部和腿部力量进行了两次测量。测试和重新测试间隔六天。第三,在一天中的六个不同时间测量了四名年龄在21至30岁之间的受试者的背部和腿部力量。竹井测力计和Lido测力计在腿部力量(r = 0.90)和背部力量(r = 0.79)方面获得了显著相关性(p < 0.001)。在腿部力量(r = 0.80)和背部力量(r = 0.91)方面发现了显著的重测相关性(p < 0.001)。测试组(1450.4 +/- 428.6 N)和重新测试组(1432.8 +/- 449.1 N)的腿部力量平均值没有差异((p > 0.05)。背部力量的测试平均值(1057.2 +/- 309.9 N)和重新测试平均值(1106.2 +/- 334.4 N)之间发现了一个小的(4.5%)但显著的差异(p < 0.05)。一天中的时间对背部和腿部力量有明显影响(p < 0.05);平均而言,峰值时间分别出现在16:53和18:20。(摘要截断于250字)