Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann R, Andreas A, Diedrich P
Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, RWTH Aachen.
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993 Dec;54(6):231-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02179832.
23 extraction sites from group I (14 patients, average age 25 years, two months) which exhibited gingival invagination during orthodontic space closure with fixed appliances were compared with an equal number of extraction sites without gingival invaginations from group II patients (13 patients, average age 22 years, three months). Clinical analysis criteria were: interdental distance, treatment period, depth of gingival invagination, plaque index, gingival index, and probing depth. The marginal bone level at the teeth and the interdental bone height were measured by radiographs. Comparisons of the group I information with the information from group II obtained by applying the same analysis criteria revealed that, given proper oral hygiene, the presence of gingival invaginations (mean depth 2.7 +/- 1.1 mm) has no influence on the hygienic state and, the level of gingival inflammation in the invagination area. However, a marginal bone loss at the teeth mesial and distal to the extraction sites, a reduction of the interdental crestal bone height, and an extended time frame for orthodontic space closure must be expected.
将第一组(14例患者,平均年龄25岁2个月)在使用固定矫治器关闭正畸间隙过程中出现牙龈内陷的23个拔牙位点,与第二组患者(13例患者,平均年龄22岁3个月)同等数量未出现牙龈内陷的拔牙位点进行比较。临床分析标准包括:牙间距离、治疗周期、牙龈内陷深度、菌斑指数、牙龈指数和探诊深度。通过X线片测量牙齿的边缘骨水平和牙间骨高度。对第一组信息与采用相同分析标准从第二组获得的信息进行比较后发现,在保持适当口腔卫生的情况下,牙龈内陷(平均深度2.7±1.1mm)的存在对卫生状况以及内陷区域的牙龈炎症水平没有影响。然而,可以预期拔牙位点近中和远中牙齿处会出现边缘骨丧失、牙间嵴顶骨高度降低以及正畸间隙关闭时间延长。