Berlin C I, Hood L J, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola R P, Rigby P, Jackson D F
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112.
Hear Res. 1993 Dec;71(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90015-s.
Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions from nominal 80 dB pSP (peak sound pressure) 80-microseconds pulses presented at 50 pulses per second were collected from the right ears of eleven normal hearing subjects using an ILO88 Otodynamic Analyzer in the non-linear mode. Clicks, pure tones, and narrow bands of noise were then presented to their left ears through insert earphones. The 80-microseconds contralateral clicks ranged in intensity from 80 dB pSP in 5 dB steps down to 60 dB pSP but data on only 10 of the subjects were collected successfully. The pure tones and narrow bands of noise centered at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were also presented through insert phones at 20, 40, 60 and 80 dB HL (Hearing Level) to all 11 subjects. The mean overall 'echo amplitude' without contralateral stimuli was 11 dB SPL and underwent more than 3 dB of overall suppression in response to the noises which were the most effective of the contralateral suppressors. When we analyzed the echo suppression to noise in 2-ms segments, we found consistent contralateral suppression of 3-4 dB concentrated in the time zones after 8 ms. Time shifts of more than 200 microseconds between the control and experimental traces were also observed in the same zones. The clicks were the next most effective suppressors, but showed their amplitude and time effects in somewhat earlier time zones. The tones were the least effective suppressors suggesting that efferent effects we measured in the human system are not strongly tonotopic. Because 'non-linear' mode high intensity clicks were deliberately selected as stimuli to evoke the TEOAE's, the emissions and their suppression can represent neither the 'true' TEOAE nor all of the efferent system's suppression abilities.
使用ILO88耳动态分析仪,以非线性模式从11名听力正常受试者的右耳收集每秒50次脉冲呈现的标称80 dB pSP(峰值声压)、80微秒脉冲诱发的点击诱发耳声发射。然后通过插入式耳机向他们的左耳呈现点击声、纯音和窄带噪声。80微秒的对侧点击声强度范围从80 dB pSP以5 dB步长降至60 dB pSP,但仅成功收集到10名受试者的数据。还通过插入式耳机向所有11名受试者以20、40、60和80 dB HL(听力级)呈现以250、500、1000、2000和4000 Hz为中心的纯音和窄带噪声。在没有对侧刺激时,平均总体“回声幅度”为11 dB SPL,并且对作为最有效的对侧抑制器的噪声做出反应时,总体抑制超过3 dB。当我们在2毫秒时间段内分析对噪声的回声抑制时,我们发现在8毫秒后的时间段内持续存在3 - 4 dB的对侧抑制。在同一区域还观察到对照和实验轨迹之间的时间偏移超过200微秒。点击声是次有效的抑制器,但在稍早的时间段内显示出其幅度和时间效应。纯音是最无效的抑制器,这表明我们在人体系统中测量到的传出效应并非强烈的音调定位。因为故意选择“非线性”模式下的高强度点击声作为刺激来诱发TEOAE,所以这些发射及其抑制既不能代表“真正的”TEOAE,也不能代表传出系统的所有抑制能力。