Suppr超能文献

快速性心律失常的机制,过去与现在。

Mechanisms of tachyarrhythmias, past and present.

作者信息

Durrer D, Lie K I, Janse M J, Schuilenburg R M

出版信息

Eur J Cardiol. 1978 Sep;8(2):281-97.

PMID:81132
Abstract

Several hypotheses, developed in the early years of arrhythmology, and frequently used for the explanation of many types of clinical tachyarrhythmias, are often based on experiments on unusual models, unphysiologic interventions, or, in some instances, on erroneously interpreted histologic findings. However, it can be demonstrated that several of these hypotheses are valid. Focal activity, unidirectional block, extremely slow conduction velocity, differences in conduction velocity in closely adjacent regions, reentry of the excitation wave, circulating excitation waves in small or large regions of the heart and other postulated mechanisms as, for example, entrance and exit block, local ventricular fibrillation, appear to be involved in the causative mechanisms of clinical tachyarrhythmias. A multicausal genesis of at least some of these must be considered seriously, particularly those which occur in acute or chronic coronary heart disease. A recent suggestion that the injury current might be involved in the genesis of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in acute myocardial ischemia and infarction is supported by observations on several properties of this current. Progress has been made in recent years but large gaps in our knowledge of mechanisms causing arrhythmias are still present.

摘要

心律失常学早期提出的几种假说,常被用于解释多种临床快速性心律失常,这些假说往往基于对异常模型的实验、非生理性干预,或者在某些情况下,基于错误解读的组织学发现。然而,可以证明其中一些假说是有效的。局部活动、单向阻滞、极慢的传导速度、紧邻区域传导速度的差异、兴奋波的折返、心脏小区域或大区域的循环兴奋波以及其他假定机制,例如,入口和出口阻滞、局部心室颤动,似乎都参与了临床快速性心律失常的发病机制。必须认真考虑其中至少一些机制的多因素成因,尤其是那些发生在急性或慢性冠心病中的机制。最近有人提出损伤电流可能参与急性心肌缺血和梗死时室性快速性心律失常的发生,这一观点得到了对该电流若干特性观察结果的支持。近年来虽已取得进展,但我们对心律失常发生机制的认识仍存在很大差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验