Koglin J, Böhm M, von Scheidt W, Stäblein A, Erdmann E
Medizinische Klinik I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 1;23(3):678-83. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90754-4.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the antiadrenergic effects of adenosine and carbachol on beta-adrenoceptor-stimulated human ventricular contractility in vivo. In addition, the antiadrenergic effects of adenosine and carbachol were compared in vitro.
Adenosine is reported to exhibit an antiadrenergic negative inotropic response in the beta-adrenergic-stimulated ventricular myocardium in vitro. The effect of adenosine is similar to the antiadrenergic effect of m-cholinoceptor stimulation in vitro.
The inotropic response in vivo was assessed in seven healthy volunteers by M-mode echocardiography and simultaneous blood pressure monitoring. It was calculated as the increase in the rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening and in the systolic pressure/dimension ratio. All volunteers received pretreatment with 450 mg of dipyridamole/day for 48 h. In addition, the effects of adenosine and carbachol in the presence of 0.03 mumol/liter of isoproterenol on cumulative concentration-response curves of isolated, electrically driven human ventricular muscle strips were compared in vitro (n = 13).
The positive inotropic response to continuous infusion of 20 ng/kg per min of isoproterenol (increase of rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening [10.2 +/- 2.1% x square root of beats/min per ms] and increase of systolic pressure/dimension ratio 1.09 +/- 0.3 mm Hg/mm) was significantly (p < 0.01) reduced by 3.6 micrograms/kg body weight of intravenous carbachol (4.2 +/- 1.2% x square root of beats/min per ms, 0.21 +/- 0.18 mm Hg/mm) but not by 50 micrograms/kg of intravenous adenosine (8.2 +/- 3.1% x square root of beats/min per ms, 1.35 +/- 0.42 mm Hg/mm), although adenosine induced a significant negative dromotropic effect. In vitro comparison of force of contraction with cumulative concentration-response curves in the presence of 0.03 mumol/liter of isoproterenol demonstrated an EC50 value (concentration producing half-maximal effect) for adenosine 466 times higher than that for carbachol (65.3 vs. 0.14 mumol/liter, p < 0.001).
In contrast to carbachol, adenosine does not attenuate the catecholamine-induced increase in contractility in the human ventricle in vivo. These differences between the A1-adenosine receptor- and m-cholinoceptor-mediated effects could be due to fewer A1-adenosine receptors or a less efficient receptor-effector coupling, or both.
本研究旨在探讨腺苷和卡巴胆碱对体内β-肾上腺素能刺激的人心室收缩性的抗肾上腺素能作用。此外,还在体外比较了腺苷和卡巴胆碱的抗肾上腺素能作用。
据报道,腺苷在体外对β-肾上腺素能刺激的心室心肌表现出抗肾上腺素能负性肌力反应。腺苷的作用类似于体外m-胆碱受体刺激的抗肾上腺素能作用。
通过M型超声心动图和同步血压监测评估7名健康志愿者的体内肌力反应。计算方法为校正心率后的圆周纤维缩短速度增加量和收缩压/直径比值增加量。所有志愿者均接受450mg双嘧达莫/天预处理48小时。此外,在体外比较了腺苷和卡巴胆碱在0.03μmol/升异丙肾上腺素存在下对分离的、电驱动的人心室肌条累积浓度-反应曲线的影响(n = 13)。
持续输注20ng/kg每分钟的异丙肾上腺素引起的正性肌力反应(校正心率后的圆周纤维缩短速度增加[10.2±2.1%×每分钟心跳次数的平方根/毫秒]和收缩压/直径比值增加1.09±0.3mmHg/mm),静脉注射3.6μg/kg体重的卡巴胆碱使其显著降低(p < 0.01)(4.2±1.2%×每分钟心跳次数的平方根/毫秒,0.21±0.18mmHg/mm),但静脉注射50μg/kg的腺苷则未使其降低(8.2±3.1%×每分钟心跳次数的平方根/毫秒,1.35±0.42mmHg/mm),尽管腺苷引起了显著的负性变传导作用。在体外,在0.03μmol/升异丙肾上腺素存在下,将收缩力与累积浓度-反应曲线进行比较,结果显示腺苷的半数有效浓度(产生半数最大效应的浓度)值比卡巴胆碱高466倍(65.3对0.14μmol/升,p < 0.001)。
与卡巴胆碱不同,腺苷在体内不会减弱儿茶酚胺引起的人心室收缩性增加。A1-腺苷受体和m-胆碱受体介导的效应之间的这些差异可能是由于A1-腺苷受体较少或受体-效应器偶联效率较低,或两者兼而有之。