Berkley M A, Debruyn B, Orban G
Laboratorium voor Neuro-en Psychophysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.
Vision Res. 1994 Jan;34(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90333-6.
Psychophysical studies of interactions between contours defined by different image attributes report that luminance-defined and illusory contours show little if any interaction. Because the contours defined by these attributes may vary in perceptual saliency, we employed the tilt aftereffect (TAE) and a cross-adaptation procedure to evaluate interaction effects between luminance-defined and illusory contours under varying saliency conditions as well as to explore the interaction between illusory and motion-defined contours. When contour salience of the adaptation or test stimuli was modified by the addition of various amounts of static noise, we observed a TAE for all combinations of contour types including the novel motion-illusory and illusory-motion pairs. The interactions demonstrated between the contour classes in this as well as other studies suggests contour invariance in the orientation domain.
关于由不同图像属性定义的轮廓之间相互作用的心理物理学研究报告称,亮度定义的轮廓和虚幻轮廓之间几乎没有(如果有的话)相互作用。由于这些属性定义的轮廓在感知显著性上可能有所不同,我们采用倾斜后效(TAE)和交叉适应程序,以评估在不同显著性条件下亮度定义的轮廓和虚幻轮廓之间的相互作用效应,并探索虚幻轮廓和运动定义轮廓之间的相互作用。当通过添加不同量的静态噪声来改变适应或测试刺激的轮廓显著性时,我们观察到了所有轮廓类型组合的TAE,包括新的运动-虚幻和虚幻-运动对。本研究以及其他研究中所展示的轮廓类别之间的相互作用表明了方向域中的轮廓不变性。