Elliott Sarah L, Shevell Steven K
Department of Psychology, Roosevelt University, 430 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60605, United States; Institute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago, United States.
Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, 940 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Institute for Mind & Biology, University of Chicago, United States; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Chicago, United States.
Vision Res. 2018 Mar;144:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
The visual system must transform a point-by-point biological representation from the photoreceptors into neural representations of separate objects. Even a uniform circular patch of light that slowly modulates in luminance can be segmented into separate central and surrounding areas merely by introducing black lines to outline a central square. The black lines cause brightness induction in the center even though the light inside and outside the square is always identical, as predicted by spatial antagonism between the square central area and its surround. Importantly, illusory Kanizsa lines forming the square are as effective for this brightness induction as real black lines, suggesting a 'form-cue invariant' cortical neural representation that does not distinguish between a central region set off by real or illusory edges. An open question is whether separate subsystems generate objects defined by real versus illusory edges, each providing the same form-cue invariant neural representation of an object, or whether form-cue invariance extends to integrating component pieces that together define an object. Experiments here show object segmentation when subparts of a square are defined by a mixture of real and illusory edges. Subjects adjusted the Michelson contrast of a separate patch to match the perceived modulation depth within the central region of a circular field that slowly oscillated in luminance. A closed, four-sided figure, no matter how constructed, reduced the perceived modulation depth within the central region. This shows that both real and illusory subparts can be integrated to segment center from surround. It supports a strong version of form-cue invariance in which neural mechanisms responsible for object segmentation are impartial to the piecemeal cues that are integrated to define an object.
视觉系统必须将来自光感受器的逐点生物表征转换为单独物体的神经表征。即使是一个亮度缓慢调制的均匀圆形光斑,仅仅通过引入黑色线条勾勒出一个中央正方形,也可以被分割成单独的中央区域和周围区域。尽管正方形内外的光始终相同,但黑色线条会在中央引起亮度诱导,这正如正方形中央区域与其周围区域之间的空间拮抗所预测的那样。重要的是,构成正方形的虚幻卡尼萨线在这种亮度诱导方面与真实的黑色线条一样有效,这表明存在一种“形式线索不变”的皮层神经表征,它无法区分由真实或虚幻边缘界定的中央区域。一个悬而未决的问题是,单独的子系统是否会生成由真实边缘与虚幻边缘定义的物体,每个子系统都提供相同的物体形式线索不变神经表征,或者形式线索不变性是否扩展到整合共同定义一个物体的组成部分。这里的实验表明,当正方形子部分由真实和虚幻边缘混合定义时,会出现物体分割。受试者调整一个单独光斑的迈克尔逊对比度,以匹配在亮度缓慢振荡的圆形区域中央部分感知到的调制深度。一个封闭的四边形图形,无论其如何构成,都会降低中央区域内感知到的调制深度。这表明真实和虚幻子部分都可以被整合起来,将中央与周围分割开。它支持一种强烈版本的形式线索不变性,即负责物体分割的神经机制对用于定义物体的零碎线索一视同仁。