Suppr超能文献

迈向管理式医疗组织统一报告标准的发展:健康计划雇主数据与信息集(第2.0版)

Toward the development of uniform reporting standards for managed care organizations: the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (Version 2.0).

作者信息

Corrigan J M, Nielsen D M

机构信息

National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC 20005.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1993 Dec;19(12):566-75. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30037-2.

Abstract

The cornerstone of HEDIS 2.0 is measurement. Only by measuring how a plan performs with respect to defined measures will an employer be able to assess a plan's value and also hold a plan accountable for its performance. Because of time and resource constraints, there are many issues related to the development and use of the performance measures contained within HEDIS 2.0 that have been incompletely addressed or not addressed at all. Following are some of the issues that warrant further consideration. Selection of performance measures. The present set of performance measures represents only a first attempt to define measures that document health plan performance in a number of areas of health care delivery. The resulting measures constitute a core data and information set and should not be considered to be an optimum set. Many other areas and measures of health plan performance were considered, including costs of specific episodes of care, age-specific utilization of defined services, patients receiving appropriate follow-up care for identified preventive health services, stage of cancer at time of diagnosis in relationship to preventive services screening, and functional outcome assessment. These measures were not included in this revision of HEDIS because of difficulties in developing specifications for the measure and/or in obtaining reliable data. It will be important to address these areas in the future. Risk adjustment of performance measures. To minimize the effects of population differences, most of the recommended performance measures assess discrete aspects of the process of care delivery (for example, percentage of pregnant women with first-trimester visit) rather than outcomes. However, interpretation of certain measures (for example, low birthweight, hospital readmission rate) will be affected by the specific member characteristics of the health plan population. Health plans and employers need to be aware of this limitation when interpreting and comparing certain performance measures, and further refinements will be needed in future ierations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)2.0的基石是衡量。只有通过衡量一项计划在既定指标方面的表现,雇主才能评估该计划的价值,并使其对自身表现负责。由于时间和资源的限制,与HEDIS 2.0中所包含的绩效衡量指标的制定和使用相关的许多问题,要么未得到充分解决,要么根本未被提及。以下是一些值得进一步考虑的问题。绩效衡量指标的选择。目前的这套绩效衡量指标只是在界定一系列医疗服务领域中记录健康计划表现的指标方面的首次尝试。最终形成的指标构成了一个核心数据和信息集,不应被视为最优集。健康计划表现的许多其他领域和指标也被考虑过,包括特定治疗阶段的成本、特定年龄段对规定服务的利用率、接受已确定的预防性健康服务的适当后续护理的患者、与预防性服务筛查相关的癌症诊断时的阶段,以及功能结果评估。由于在制定该指标的规范和/或获取可靠数据方面存在困难,这些指标未被纳入本次HEDIS修订版。未来解决这些领域的问题将很重要。绩效衡量指标的风险调整。为了尽量减少人群差异的影响,大多数推荐的绩效衡量指标评估的是医疗服务提供过程中的离散方面(例如,孕早期就诊的孕妇比例)而非结果。然而,某些指标(例如,低出生体重、医院再入院率)的解读会受到健康计划人群的特定成员特征的影响。健康计划和雇主在解读和比较某些绩效衡量指标时需要意识到这一局限性,并且在未来的迭代中还需要进一步完善。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验