Casey B J, Gordon C T, Mannheim G B, Rumsey J M
Child Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993 Nov;15(6):933-46. doi: 10.1080/01688639308402609.
A dysfunctional attention hypothesis of the basis of savant skills was tested with a series of computerized tasks that assessed the ability to divide, shift, direct, and sustain attention. Ten healthy men with pervasive developmental disorders and unusual calendar-calculating skill, and 10 age- and sex-matched controls were tested. There were four general findings. First, the savants and controls did not differ on a measure of visual sustained attention. Second, the savants failed to detect rare auditory targets significantly more than did the controls. Third, the savants were unable to efficiently divide their attention when required to detect both visual and auditory targets simultaneously. Finally, deficient orienting or a deficit in shifting selective attention from one stimulus location to another was evidenced in overall slower reaction times for the savants across tasks requiring shifts and redirecting of attention. This deficit was attributed to an inability to disengage attention as a result of deficient orienting and overselectivity.
一项关于学者症候群技能基础的功能失调注意力假说,通过一系列计算机化任务进行了测试,这些任务评估了分配、转移、引导和维持注意力的能力。对10名患有广泛性发育障碍且具有非凡日历计算技能的健康男性,以及10名年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了测试。有四个主要发现。第一,在视觉持续注意力的测量上,学者症候群患者和对照组没有差异。第二,学者症候群患者比对照组更难检测到罕见的听觉目标。第三,当需要同时检测视觉和听觉目标时,学者症候群患者无法有效地分配注意力。最后,在需要转移和重新引导注意力的任务中,学者症候群患者的总体反应时间较慢,这表明他们在定向或从一个刺激位置转移选择性注意力方面存在缺陷。这种缺陷归因于由于定向不足和过度选择性而导致的无法脱离注意力。