Burgio L D, McCormick K A, Scheve A S, Engel B T, Hawkins A, Leahy E
Center for the Aging, Birmingham School of Medicine, Alabama.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Mar;42(3):315-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb01758.x.
To determine the effects of different prompted voiding schedules on urinary incontinence on a continence unit (CU) and the maintenance of benefits on normal nursing units.
Multiphase study with both intra- and inter-subject comparisons.
Subjects were 41 consenting incontinent nursing home residents. Based on clinical criteria, subjects were assigned to one of four treatment groups that varied as to the schedule of prompted voiding received.
The study used chart review, Katz ADL, and MMSE. Urologic status, self-initiated toileting, urine volumes voided, and incontinence assessed by pad/pants checks were measured by research nurses. Baseline pad check data were collected on residents' normal nursing units. Residents were transferred to the CU where baseline measurement was repeated, and the effects of different prompted voiding schedules were then assessed. Indigenous staff were trained to use prompted voiding, and nurse supervisors were instructed in special procedures for enhancing maintenance of the intervention. Residents were returned to their normal units and the maintenance of improvements in continence status was assessed at 2 weeks and 3 months post-CU discharge.
One of the four groups showed significant improvement on the CU in response to the 2-hour schedule; two groups improved on the less intensive 3-hour schedule (P < 0.05). Two groups maintained this improvement on their normal nursing units (P < 0.05); one group showed a non-significant trend toward improvement. Self-initiated toileting decreased (P < 0.05) and volume voids in an appropriate receptacle increased (P < 0.05) during training.
Prompted voiding is an effective treatment for urinary incontinence, and a less intensive 3-hour schedule may be superior to the standard 2-hour schedule for some residents. These improvements in dryness can be maintained by normal nursing home staff if formal staff management procedures are utilized by nurse supervisors.
确定不同的定时排尿方案对失禁护理单元(CU)尿失禁的影响以及在普通护理单元中这些益处的维持情况。
采用包含受试者内和受试者间比较的多阶段研究。
41名同意参与的失禁养老院居民。根据临床标准,受试者被分配到四个治疗组之一,各组接受的定时排尿方案不同。
本研究采用病历审查、Katz日常生活活动能力量表和简易精神状态检查表。研究护士测量泌尿状况、自主排尿情况、排尿量以及通过护垫/裤子检查评估的失禁情况。在居民的普通护理单元收集基线护垫检查数据。居民被转移至CU,在此重复进行基线测量,然后评估不同定时排尿方案的效果。对本地工作人员进行定时排尿培训,并指导护士主管采用特殊程序以加强干预措施的维持。居民返回其普通护理单元,并在从CU出院后2周和3个月评估失禁状况改善的维持情况。
四个组中的一组在CU中对2小时排尿方案有显著改善;两组在强度较低的3小时排尿方案下有改善(P < 0.05)。两组在其普通护理单元维持了这种改善(P < 0.05);一组显示出不显著的改善趋势。在训练期间,自主排尿减少(P < 0.05),在合适容器中的排尿量增加(P < 0.05)。
定时排尿是治疗尿失禁的有效方法,对于一些居民来说,强度较低的3小时排尿方案可能优于标准的2小时排尿方案。如果护士主管采用正规的工作人员管理程序,养老院的普通工作人员可以维持这些干爽方面的改善。