Suppr超能文献

在持续性室性心动过速或心室颤动患者中,反射性与紧张性迷走神经活动作为预后参数的研究

Reflex versus tonic vagal activity as a prognostic parameter in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.

作者信息

Hohnloser S H, Klingenheben T, van de Loo A, Hablawetz E, Just H, Schwartz P J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1068-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1068.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The autonomic nervous system has been demonstrated to play a decisive role in the genesis of sudden cardiac death. The loss of protective vagal reflexes, in particular, appears to be associated with an increased incidence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Two clinically applicable methods for assessment of cardiac autonomic control have been developed: determination of heart rate variability and evaluation of baroreflex sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To compare the potential predictive value of both methods, two groups of patients were studied. Group 1 comprised 14 postinfarction patients who had experienced at least one episode of ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia and who were studied after this event. Group 2 consisted of 14 postinfarction patients without tachyarrhythmic events after their infarct. Both groups were carefully matched with respect to age, sex, infarct location, extent of coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, blood pressure, and heart rate at rest. Heart rate variability was assessed from 24-hour Holter recordings, and baroreflex sensitivity was determined by means of the phenylephrine method. Indices of heart rate variability were not significantly different between the two groups (SD of the mean RR interval, 84 +/- 30 milliseconds versus 103 +/- 20 milliseconds; proportion of adjacent RR intervals > 50 milliseconds different, 2.8 +/- 3.2% versus 5.0 +/- 4.1% in group 1 versus 2). Baroreflex sensitivity, however, showed a striking difference: Group 1 patients had a mean value of 1.75 +/- 1.63 ms/mm Hg compared with 9.17 +/- 5.40 ms/mm Hg in group 2 (P = .0002). Eleven of 14 group 1 patients had a baroreflex sensitivity < or = 3.0 ms/mm Hg. By contrast, only 1 of 14 group 2 patients had such a depressed value.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that postmyocardial infarction patients who develop life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, compared with carefully matched postinfarction patients without major arrhythmic episodes, differ strikingly in terms of baroreflex sensitivity but not in terms of heart rate variability. This finding may have implications for the risk stratification of postinfarction patients and may lead to a differential therapeutic strategy based on autonomic testing.

摘要

背景

自主神经系统已被证明在心脏性猝死的发生中起决定性作用。尤其是保护性迷走反射的丧失,似乎与恶性室性心律失常的发生率增加有关。已开发出两种临床适用的评估心脏自主神经控制的方法:心率变异性测定和压力反射敏感性评估。

方法与结果

为比较这两种方法的潜在预测价值,对两组患者进行了研究。第1组包括14例心肌梗死后经历过至少一次室颤或持续性室性心动过速发作的患者,在该事件发生后对其进行研究。第2组由14例心肌梗死后无快速心律失常事件的患者组成。两组在年龄、性别、梗死部位、冠状动脉疾病程度、左心室射血分数、血压和静息心率方面进行了仔细匹配。通过24小时动态心电图记录评估心率变异性,采用苯肾上腺素法测定压力反射敏感性。两组间心率变异性指标无显著差异(平均RR间期标准差,第1组为84±30毫秒,第2组为103±20毫秒;相邻RR间期相差>50毫秒的比例,第1组为2.8±3.2%,第2组为5.0±4.1%)。然而,压力反射敏感性显示出显著差异:第1组患者的平均值为1.75±1.63毫秒/毫米汞柱,而第2组为9.17±5.40毫秒/毫米汞柱(P = 0.0002)。第1组14例患者中有11例压力反射敏感性≤3.0毫秒/毫米汞柱。相比之下,第2组14例患者中只有1例有如此低的值。

结论

本研究结果表明,与仔细匹配的无重大心律失常发作的心肌梗死后患者相比,发生危及生命的室性心律失常的心肌梗死后患者在压力反射敏感性方面有显著差异,但在心率变异性方面无差异。这一发现可能对心肌梗死后患者的风险分层有影响,并可能导致基于自主神经测试的差异化治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验