Kammer C H
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02114.
Res Nurs Health. 1994 Apr;17(2):89-98. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770170204.
The purpose of this exploratory study, based on the stress and coping framework of Folkman and Lazarus, was to describe relationships among stress appraisal, coping, and characteristics of individuals responsible for older adults recently placed in nursing homes. One hundred individuals completed an information form, emotion stress appraisal, and a revised Ways of Coping instrument by mail. Multiple regression analysis of 16 respondent characteristics showed significant contribution of 8 variables to 4 stress appraisal types (threat, harm, challenge, benefit) and 11 variables to 8 ways of coping. Visit frequency accounted for highest degree of variance in all appraisals. Stress appraisal accounted for most variance in coping. Implications for design and testing of nursing interventions are suggested.
这项探索性研究基于福克曼和拉扎勒斯的压力与应对框架，旨在描述压力评估、应对方式以及负责近期入住养老院老年人的个体特征之间的关系。100名个体通过邮件填写了一份信息表、情绪压力评估表以及一份修订后的应对方式量表。对16项受访者特征进行的多元回归分析表明，8个变量对4种压力评估类型（威胁、伤害、挑战、益处）有显著贡献，11个变量对8种应对方式有显著贡献。探访频率在所有评估中解释的方差程度最高。压力评估在应对方式中解释的方差最多。文中还提出了对护理干预设计和测试的启示。
