Suppr超能文献

儿童创伤性脑损伤严重程度指标作为神经行为预后预测指标的比较

Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity as predictors of neurobehavioral outcome in children.

作者信息

McDonald C M, Jaffe K M, Fay G C, Polissar N L, Martin K M, Liao S, Rivara J B

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California 95817.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Mar;75(3):328-37. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90038-8.

Abstract

This study examined the ability of early measures of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity to predict neurobehavioral and functional skill outcomes shortly after injury and at 1 year postinjury. Ninety-eight children aged 6 to 15 years with TBI were consecutively identified on presentation to two regional medical centers. Ten measures of TBI severity were subsequently administered: initial Glasgow Coma Scale (motor, eye, verbal, and total GCS), duration of loss of consciousness, Abbreviated Injury Scale Head score, GCS motor score at 3 days postinjury, days to reach a total GCS score of 15, days to reach a GCS motor score of six, and duration of posttraumatic amnesia (days to reach a 75% performance on the Children's Orientation and Amnesia Test [COAT]). Cases were matched individually with controls on the basis of age, gender, school grade, the classroom teacher's assessment of pre-morbid level of academic performance in reading and arithmetic, and pre-morbid behavior. Both groups received intellectual, neuropsychologic, academic, and functional skill assessments three weeks after the case achieved full orientation and 1 year later. The indices of injury severity that were most predictive of both early and 1-year outcome across all neurobehavioral and functional measures were (1) days to an age-adjusted 75% performance on the COAT, (2) days to a GCS score of 15, and (3) initial total GCS score. For most outcome areas, a single measure of severity predicted outcome almost as well as multiple measures. However, early and 1-year academic performance and 1-year memory performance were best predicted by considering multiple indices of brain injury severity. The GCS verbal and motor scores were better predictors of outcome than the GCS eye score. However, consideration of individual GCS subscores did not improve upon prediction of outcome versus the GCS total score. These results provide strong validation for the use of duration of posttraumatic amnesia, measured by the COAT, as a measure of TBI severity and a significant indicator of neurobehavioral and functional outcome in children.

摘要

本研究探讨了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)严重程度的早期指标对损伤后不久及损伤后1年神经行为和功能技能结果的预测能力。在两家地区医疗中心就诊时,连续识别出98名6至15岁的TBI儿童。随后实施了10项TBI严重程度指标:初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(运动、眼睛、言语和总GCS)、意识丧失持续时间、简明损伤量表头部评分、损伤后3天的GCS运动评分、达到总GCS评分15所需天数、达到GCS运动评分6所需天数以及创伤后遗忘持续时间(在儿童定向和遗忘测试[COAT]中达到75%表现所需天数)。根据年龄、性别、年级、课堂教师对伤前阅读和算术学业成绩水平的评估以及伤前行为,将病例与对照组进行个体匹配。两组在病例完全定向后3周和1年后接受智力、神经心理学、学业和功能技能评估。在所有神经行为和功能指标中,对早期和1年结果预测性最强的损伤严重程度指标为:(1)在COAT上达到年龄调整后75%表现所需天数;(2)达到GCS评分15所需天数;(3)初始总GCS评分。对于大多数结果领域,单一严重程度指标对结果的预测效果几乎与多个指标相同。然而,通过考虑多个脑损伤严重程度指标,能最好地预测早期和1年的学业成绩以及1年的记忆表现。GCS言语和运动评分比GCS眼睛评分更能预测结果。然而,与GCS总分相比,考虑个体GCS子评分并不能改善对结果的预测。这些结果为使用通过COAT测量的创伤后遗忘持续时间作为TBI严重程度的指标以及儿童神经行为和功能结果的重要指标提供了有力验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验