Cherkin D C, Deyo R A, Wheeler K, Ciol M A
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Jan;37(1):15-22. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370104.
This study examined patterns of diagnostic test use for patients with low back pain. Three specific questions were addressed: 1) What tests do physicians recommend for patients with 3 common types of low back pain? 2) Do physicians in various specialties differ in the tests they would order? and 3) How appropriate are physicians' choices of tests, based on current medical knowledge and expert recommendations?
A stratified national random sample of 2,604 physicians in 8 specialties was mailed questionnaires asking about the tests they would order for hypothetical patients with acute back pain, sciatica, or chronic low back pain. Physicians were also asked which procedures they generally used to evaluate suspected lumbar nerve root compression. These responses were compared with guidelines that have been suggested by the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders, based on comprehensive evaluation of the scientific literature.
Approximately 1,100 physicians responded to the survey (43% response rate). Magnetic resonance imaging was the most frequently used procedure for evaluating suspected lumbar nerve root compression, although a majority of neurosurgeons would still use myelography. Neurosurgeons and neurologists were twice as likely as other specialists to order an imaging study for patients with acute nonradiating pain or chronic back pain. Physiatrists and neurologists were more than 3 times as likely as other specialists to order electromyograms for acute back pain with sciatica or chronic back pain. Rheumatologists were almost twice as likely as other specialists to order laboratory tests for both acute and chronic back pain. The reported use of imaging and electrodiagnostic tests was generally premature and more extensive than that recommended by the Quebec Task Force.
There is little consensus, either within or among specialties, on the use of diagnostic tests for patients with back pain. Thus, the diagnostic evaluation depends heavily on the individual physician and his or her specialty, and not just the patient's symptoms and findings. Furthermore, many physicians may be ordering imaging studies too early and for patients who do not have the appropriate clinical indications. These results suggest a need for additional clinical guidelines as well as better adherence to existing guidelines.
本研究调查了腰痛患者诊断性检查的使用模式。研究涉及三个具体问题:1)医生会为三种常见类型的腰痛患者推荐哪些检查?2)不同专科的医生在开具检查项目上是否存在差异?3)基于当前医学知识和专家建议,医生选择的检查项目有多恰当?
对8个专科的2604名医生进行分层全国随机抽样,邮寄问卷询问他们会为假设的急性背痛、坐骨神经痛或慢性腰痛患者开具哪些检查。医生们还被问及他们通常用于评估疑似腰椎神经根受压的程序。将这些回答与魁北克脊柱疾病特别工作组基于对科学文献的全面评估所建议的指南进行比较。
约1100名医生回复了调查(回复率为43%)。磁共振成像(MRI)是评估疑似腰椎神经根受压最常用的程序,不过大多数神经外科医生仍会使用脊髓造影。神经外科医生和神经科医生为急性非放射性疼痛或慢性背痛患者开具影像学检查的可能性是其他专科医生的两倍。物理治疗师和神经科医生为伴有坐骨神经痛的急性背痛或慢性背痛患者开具肌电图检查的可能性是其他专科医生的三倍多。风湿病学家为急性和慢性背痛患者开具实验室检查的可能性几乎是其他专科医生的两倍。报告的影像学和电诊断检查的使用通常过早且比魁北克特别工作组建议的更为广泛。
在腰痛患者诊断性检查的使用上,各专科内部及之间几乎没有共识。因此,诊断评估很大程度上取决于个体医生及其专科,而不仅仅是患者的症状和检查结果。此外,许多医生可能过早地为没有适当临床指征的患者开具影像学检查。这些结果表明需要更多的临床指南以及更好地遵循现有指南。