Riccio A, Natale D, Fratellanza G, Infranzi E, Farinaro C, Pronesti G, Casiere D, Tullio Cataldo P, Chirianni A, Bonadies G
Cattedra di Metodologia Clinica, Facoltà di Medicina, Università Federico II di Napoli.
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1993 Mar;69(3):203-8.
The presence of anti-platelet autoantibodies has been reported in many cases of HIV infection, but there is no accordance about their pathogenic role in the onset of thrombocytopenia in the patients studied. In the present study surface anti-platelet antibodies (PAIgG) and serum anti-platelet antibodies (sPAIgG) were assayed in a group of 135 HIV-infected patients (109 men, 26 women), in different clinical stages by using an immunofluorescence test (PSIFT). In order to investigate the possible correlation of the positivity of these autoantibodies and the onset of thrombocytopenia, some of these patients were controlled in a follow-up study, with two successful controls: 10 months (II control: 89 patients) and 20 months (III control: 59 patients) after the first time. In the I control PAIgG were positive in 68 subjects (50.4%) and sPAIgG in 34 (25.2%); both PAIgG and sPAIgG were present in 23 patients (17%). 56 patients did not present anti-plt antibodies (41.5%). No significantly different distribution of these autoantibodies in each stage of disease was observed. The mean value of platelet count resulted in the normal range both in the anti-plt antibody positive and in the anti-plt antibody negative patients, but the value found in the anti-plt antibody positive patients was significantly lower than the one found in the anti-plt antibody negative group (p < 0.01). This difference was more marked between the group with PAIgG and anti-plt antibody negative patients than between the group with sPAIgG and the anti-plt antibody negative patients (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在许多HIV感染病例中都报告了抗血小板自身抗体的存在,但在所研究的患者中,关于它们在血小板减少症发病中的致病作用尚无定论。在本研究中,采用免疫荧光试验(PSIFT)对135例处于不同临床阶段的HIV感染患者(109例男性,26例女性)进行了表面抗血小板抗体(PAIgG)和血清抗血小板抗体(sPAIgG)检测。为了研究这些自身抗体阳性与血小板减少症发病之间的可能相关性,对其中一些患者进行了随访研究,进行了两次成功的对照:首次检测后10个月(第二次对照:89例患者)和20个月(第三次对照:59例患者)。在第一次对照中,68名受试者(50.4%)PAIgG呈阳性,34名(25.2%)sPAIgG呈阳性;23例患者(17%)PAIgG和sPAIgG均呈阳性。56例患者未出现抗血小板抗体(41.5%)。在疾病的各个阶段,未观察到这些自身抗体的分布有显著差异。抗血小板抗体阳性患者和抗血小板抗体阴性患者的血小板计数平均值均在正常范围内,但抗血小板抗体阳性患者的数值显著低于抗血小板抗体阴性组(p<0.01)。PAIgG组与抗血小板抗体阴性患者之间的差异比sPAIgG组与抗血小板抗体阴性患者之间的差异更明显(p<0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)