Swain D P
Wellness Institute and Research Center, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529-0196.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jan;26(1):58-63.
Bicycling is a complex sport in which an athlete's energy cost is related to two principal forces: air resistance when traveling on flat terrain, and gravity when traveling uphill. Both wind tunnel data and physiological measurements suggest that air resistance scales as body mass to about the 1/3 power. Thus, large cyclists have only slightly greater frontal drags than small cyclists. If expressed relative to body mass, the frontal drag of small cyclists is considerably greater than that of large cyclists. The difference in frontal drag (energy cost) is not made up for by the advantage to small cyclists in relative VO2max (energy supply), since the mass exponent for drag (1/3) is closer to zero than that for VO2max (2/3). Thus, small cyclists should be at a disadvantage in flat time trials, which field data support. The energy cost of riding uphill slightly favors the large cyclist, because the weight of the bicycle represents a relatively smaller load than it does to a small cyclist. The mass exponent is 0.79. Since this exponent is greater than that for VO2max, the small cyclists have an advantage in climbing, which is supported by field data.
骑自行车是一项复杂的运动,在这项运动中,运动员的能量消耗与两个主要因素有关:在平坦地形上骑行时的空气阻力,以及爬坡时的重力。风洞数据和生理测量结果都表明,空气阻力与体重的关系约为体重的1/3次方。因此,体型较大的自行车运动员的正面阻力仅比体型较小的自行车运动员略大。如果按体重来计算,体型较小的自行车运动员的正面阻力要比体型较大的自行车运动员大得多。正面阻力(能量消耗)的差异无法通过体型较小的自行车运动员在相对最大摄氧量(能量供应)方面的优势来弥补,因为阻力的质量指数(1/3)比最大摄氧量的质量指数(2/3)更接近零。因此,在平地计时赛中,体型较小的自行车运动员应该处于劣势,现场数据也支持这一点。爬坡时的能量消耗对体型较大的自行车运动员略有有利,因为自行车的重量相对于体型较小的自行车运动员来说是一个相对较小的负荷。质量指数为0.79。由于这个指数大于最大摄氧量的指数,体型较小的自行车运动员在爬坡方面具有优势,现场数据也支持这一点。