Heil Daniel P
Department of Health and Human Development, Hoseaus 101, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3540, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Oct;87(6):520-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0662-9. Epub 2002 Jul 5.
This study was designed to evaluate the scaling relationship between body mass ( m(b)) and projected frontal area ( A(P)) in competitive male cyclists using traditional drop-style handlebars. A group of 21 male cyclists [mean (SD) m(b) 74.4 (7.2) kg, height 1.82 (0.06) m, age 23.6 (5.1) years] had A(P) determined from photographs taken while seated on their own racing bicycles in four body positions: (1) stem position; (2) brake hoods position; (3) drops position; (4) traditional aero-position. For each position, A(P) for the body of the cyclist (Body A(P)), as well as the cyclist and his bicycle (Total A(P)), were determined. Body A(P) was significantly smaller than Total A(P) in all four positions by a nearly constant bicycle A(P) of 0.117-0.124 m(2). Using multiple log-linear regression analysis procedures, prediction equations were developed for both Body A(P) and Total A(P) (dependent variables) using a cluster of binary-coded variables to indicate body position and m(b) as independent variables ( n=88 observations). The regression analysis revealed that Body A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.720 power [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.585-0.855], which did not differ significantly from the +0.762 exponent reported previously for Body A(P) whilst using aero-handlebars. In contrast, Total A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.594 power (95% CI: 0.468-0.720) which was significantly lower than +0.762 exponent reported previously. The lower exponent for Total A(P) is explained by the nearly constant contribution of the bicycle A(P) to Total A(P) (mean bicycle A(P)=0.122 m(2)). These data help to explain the determinants of A(P) and aerodynamic drag in competitive male cyclists who use the traditional body postures.
本研究旨在评估使用传统下弯式车把的竞技男性自行车运动员的体重(m(b))与投影 frontal 面积(A(P))之间的比例关系。一组21名男性自行车运动员[平均(标准差)m(b) 74.4(7.2)kg,身高1.82(0.06)m,年龄23.6(5.1)岁],其A(P)通过坐在自己的赛车自行车上处于四个身体姿势时拍摄的照片来确定:(1)车把立管位置;(2)刹车把位置;(3)下弯位置;(4)传统空气动力学姿势。对于每个姿势,确定了自行车运动员身体的A(P)(身体A(P))以及自行车运动员及其自行车的A(P)(总A(P))。在所有四个姿势中,身体A(P)均明显小于总A(P),自行车A(P)几乎恒定,为0.117 - 0.124 m(2)。使用多元对数线性回归分析程序,以一组二进制编码变量表示身体姿势,m(b)作为自变量(n = 88次观察),为身体A(P)和总A(P)(因变量)建立了预测方程。回归分析表明,身体A(P)与m(b)的比例为+0.720次方[95%置信区间(CI):0.585 - 0.855],这与之前使用空气动力学车把时报告的身体A(P)的+0.762指数没有显著差异。相比之下,总A(P)与m(b)的比例为+0.594次方(95% CI:0.468 - 0.720),明显低于之前报告的+0.762指数。总A(P)较低指数可以通过自行车A(P)对总A(P)的几乎恒定贡献来解释(平均自行车A(P) = 0.122 m(2))。这些数据有助于解释使用传统身体姿势的竞技男性自行车运动员A(P)和空气动力学阻力的决定因素。