Lamb M R, Yund E W
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Martinez, California 94553.
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Dec;54(6):773-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03211802.
Can spatial frequency differences between local and global forms account for differences in the way different levels of structure are analyzed? We examined this question by having subjects identify local or global forms of hierarchical stimuli that had been contrast balanced. Contrast balancing eliminates low spatial frequencies, so that both local and global forms must be identified on the basis of high spatial frequency information. Response times (RTs) to global (but not local) forms were slowed for contrast-balanced stimuli, suggesting that low spatial frequencies mediate the global RT advantage typically found. In contrast, interference between local and global forms was little affected by contrast balancing or by shifts of attention between local and global forms, suggesting that it does not result from inhibitory interactions between spatial frequency channels or from temporal precedence of low versus high spatial frequency information. Finally, shifts of attention between local and global forms were also little affected by contrast balancing, suggesting that they were not based on spatial frequency.
局部与全局形式之间的空间频率差异能否解释不同层次结构的分析方式上的差异?我们通过让受试者识别经过对比度平衡的分层刺激的局部或全局形式来研究这个问题。对比度平衡消除了低空间频率,因此局部和全局形式都必须基于高空间频率信息来识别。对于对比度平衡的刺激,对全局(而非局部)形式的反应时间(RTs)变慢,这表明低空间频率介导了通常发现的全局RT优势。相比之下,局部和全局形式之间的干扰几乎不受对比度平衡或局部与全局形式之间注意力转移的影响,这表明它不是由空间频率通道之间的抑制性相互作用或低空间频率信息与高空间频率信息的时间先后顺序导致的。最后,局部和全局形式之间的注意力转移也几乎不受对比度平衡的影响,这表明它们不是基于空间频率的。