Suppr超能文献

膈神经起搏——正压通气的替代方法:所需的护理

Phrenic nerve pacing--an alternative to positive pressure ventilation: the required nursing care.

作者信息

Kovach G M, Henry S

出版信息

AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1993 Aug;4(3):573-7.

PMID:8136231
Abstract

Phrenic nerve pacing as a method of ventilation was first recognized in 1783. For years, this technique was not used because of the lack of practical technology. Interest in phrenic nerve pacing was renewed in the 1960s with the development of a radio frequency transmission system. Applicable to a limited patient population, phrenic nerve pacing has several benefits over positive-pressure ventilation. Benefits include greater patient mobility, verbal articulation, less mechanical noise, and breathing by natural negative-pressure. This article provides information for nurses who care for patients ventilated by phrenic nerve pacing.

摘要

膈神经起搏作为一种通气方法于1783年首次被认识。多年来,由于缺乏实用技术,该技术未被使用。随着射频传输系统的发展,20世纪60年代人们对膈神经起搏的兴趣得以恢复。膈神经起搏适用于有限的患者群体,与正压通气相比有几个优点。优点包括患者活动度更大、言语清晰度更高、机械噪音更小以及通过自然负压呼吸。本文为护理接受膈神经起搏通气患者的护士提供信息。

相似文献

4
The phrenic pacemaker.膈神经起搏器
Nursing. 1979 May;9(5):41-9.
6
Phrenic nerve stimulation: the Australian experience.膈神经刺激:澳大利亚的经验。
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Feb;17(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.06.012. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验