Satoh T, Kumamoto Y, Hirose T, Nishimura M, Koroku M, Matsumoto A, Miyashita N, Gohro T, Ikegaki S, Koroku Y
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1994 Jan;68(1):116-26. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.68.116.
Recently, two new kits, HITAZYME (Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd.) and SERO IPALISA (Savyon Diagnostics, Ltd.), for the assay of anti-C. trachomatis antibodies by the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method have been developed and put into clinical application. In the study reported here, the authors investigated the clinical usefulness of these assay kits, together with the IPAzyme and micro-IF test, in the diagnosis of cases of urogenital tract C. trachomatis infections. 1. The positive rates for IgA antibodies, which are considered to be an indicator of active infection, obtained with the HITAZYME and SERO IPALISA kits in the 82 antigen-positive cases were significantly (p < 0.005) higher than the rates obtained with the IPAzyme and micro-IF test. These results showed the usefulness of the HITAZYME and SERO IPALISA kits for detecting C. trachomatis infections. 2. A comparison was made of the assay results obtained with the HITAZYME and SERO IPALISA kits, and it was found that there was a large number of cases (142) that tested negative for IgA antibodies with the HITAZYME but positive with the SERO IPALISA kit. We carried out a confirmatory test on the specimens of cases for which the results obtained with the HITAZYME and SERO IPALISA kits were not in agreement. This test employed the Western blotting method using COMC (the antigen extracted from EB of C. trachomatis strain L2 and used in the HITAZYME kit) and whole EB of C. trachomatis strain L2 (the antigen used in the SERO IPALISA kit). The results showed a significantly higher degree of agreement between the HITAZYME kit data and the Western blotting data than between the SERO IPALISA kit data and the Western blotting data. 3. In addition, with the objective of investigating the existence of cross reactivity with anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies, we performed Western blotting using as the antigen crude whole EB of C. pneumoniae strain TW-183. The results showed that anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies were detected in 25 of 35 (71.4%) cases that were negative with C. trachomatis antigen and the HITAZYME kit and positive with the SERO IPALISA kit. These findings indicate a strong possibility that these cases positive with the SERO IPALISA kit are due to a cross reaction with anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
最近,已开发出两种用于通过酶免疫测定(EIA)方法检测抗沙眼衣原体抗体的新试剂盒,即HITAZYME(日立化成株式会社)和SERO IPALISA(Savyon诊断有限公司),并已投入临床应用。在本文报道的研究中,作者研究了这些检测试剂盒以及IPAzyme和微量免疫荧光试验在泌尿生殖道沙眼衣原体感染病例诊断中的临床实用性。1. 在82例抗原阳性病例中,使用HITAZYME和SERO IPALISA试剂盒获得的被认为是活动性感染指标的IgA抗体阳性率显著高于(p < 0.005)使用IPAzyme和微量免疫荧光试验获得的阳性率。这些结果表明HITAZYME和SERO IPALISA试剂盒在检测沙眼衣原体感染方面的实用性。2. 对使用HITAZYME和SERO IPALISA试剂盒获得的检测结果进行了比较,发现有大量病例(142例)HITAZYME试剂盒检测IgA抗体为阴性,但SERO IPALISA试剂盒检测为阳性。我们对HITAZYME和SERO IPALISA试剂盒结果不一致的病例标本进行了确证试验。该试验采用蛋白质印迹法,使用COMC(从沙眼衣原体L2菌株的EB中提取并用于HITAZYME试剂盒的抗原)和沙眼衣原体L2菌株的全EB(用于SERO IPALISA试剂盒的抗原)。结果显示,HITAZYME试剂盒数据与蛋白质印迹数据之间的一致性程度显著高于SERO IPALISA试剂盒数据与蛋白质印迹数据之间的一致性程度。3. 此外,为了研究与抗肺炎衣原体抗体的交叉反应性,我们以肺炎衣原体TW-183菌株的粗全EB为抗原进行了蛋白质印迹试验。结果显示,在35例沙眼衣原体抗原和HITAZYME试剂盒检测为阴性但SERO IPALISA试剂盒检测为阳性的病例中,有25例(71.4%)检测到抗肺炎衣原体抗体。这些发现表明,这些SERO IPALISA试剂盒检测为阳性的病例很可能是由于与抗肺炎衣原体抗体的交叉反应所致。(摘要截选至400字)