• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)来检测和纠正体格检查中的教学错误。

The use of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for detecting and correcting teaching-learning errors in physical examination.

作者信息

Sethuraman K R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of PG Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India.

出版信息

Med Teach. 1993;15(4):365-8. doi: 10.3109/01421599309006658.

DOI:10.3109/01421599309006658
PMID:8139409
Abstract

The innovative use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to detect and correct teaching-learning (T-L) errors in clinical skills is described. The group performance errors could be classified as Type I (faulty performance or omission of a step), Type II (failure to recognize or correctly interpret a clinical sign) or combined (Type I & II) errors. Type I errors were due to ineffective or absent T-L experiences. Type II errors were due to poor concept attainment or inability to discriminate between the differences in a clinical sign. Clinical demonstration during feedback was effective in eliminating Type I errors. Correcting Type II errors of the group needed more time and effort and was only partially effective.

摘要

本文描述了客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在检测和纠正临床技能教学(T-L)错误方面的创新应用。小组表现错误可分为I型(步骤执行错误或遗漏)、II型(未能识别或正确解读临床体征)或复合型(I型和II型)错误。I型错误是由于教学效果不佳或缺乏教学经验。II型错误是由于概念掌握不足或无法区分临床体征的差异。反馈过程中的临床示范对消除I型错误有效。纠正小组的II型错误需要更多时间和精力,且效果有限。

相似文献

1
The use of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for detecting and correcting teaching-learning errors in physical examination.使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)来检测和纠正体格检查中的教学错误。
Med Teach. 1993;15(4):365-8. doi: 10.3109/01421599309006658.
2
Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.使用新型客观结构化临床考试评估四年级医学生的肌肉骨骼检查技能和诊断推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 14;16(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0780-4.
3
How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).二年级学生的物理诊断学学得如何?客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2002;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-2-1. Epub 2002 Jan 10.
4
Implementing the objective structured clinical examination in a traditional medical school.在传统医学院校实施客观结构化临床考试。
Acad Med. 1991 Jun;66(6):345-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199106000-00008.
5
Impact of a Student-Driven, Virtual Patient Application on Objective Structured Clinical Examination Performance: Observational Study.学生驱动的虚拟患者应用程序对客观结构化临床考试成绩的影响:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 22;20(2):e60. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7548.
6
Assessing physical examination skills of senior medical students: knowing how versus knowing when.
Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10 Suppl):S30-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00010.
7
The effect of gender interactions on students' physical examination ratings in objective structured clinical examination stations.性别交互作用对客观结构化临床考试站中学生体格检查评分的影响。
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1772-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52ef8.
8
Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.评估临床教学质量:一项初步研究。
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):379-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03612.x.
9
Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia.在澳大利亚的客观结构化临床考试中,考官的资历和经验与沟通技能评分时的偏差有关,但与检查技能评分无关。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.17. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.形成性客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间的反馈质量取决于带教老师的个人情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Using very short answer errors to guide teaching.使用简短回答错误来指导教学。
Clin Teach. 2022 Apr;19(2):100-105. doi: 10.1111/tct.13458. Epub 2022 Jan 25.