Herr D W, King D, Griffin V T, Watkinson W P, Boyes W K, Ali J S, Dyer R S
Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Physiol Behav. 1994 Jan;55(1):83-99. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90014-0.
The negative peak occurring approximately 160 ms after stimulation (peak N160) of flash evoked potentials (FEPs) of rats changes with repeated testing. Habituation, sensitization, and arousal have all been invoked to explain these changes, but few studies have directly tested these explanations. We examined within-session changes in peak N160 amplitude with repeated testing, and the modulatory effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise. Peak N160 amplitude increased with daily testing (between-session changes), and was larger at greater stimulus intensities. In contrast, peak N160 amplitude underwent within-session increases on early days and within-session decreases on later days. The within-session changes were not affected by stimulus intensity. In rats previously tested in a quiet environment, exposure to acoustic white noise increased motor activity and transiently decreased peak N160 amplitude, which then increased and subsequently decreased with continued photic and acoustic stimulation. Repeated testing in the presence of noise did not alter the within-session changes in peak N160 amplitude. Heart rate showed both within- and between-session decreases, but was unaffected by noise. The data suggest that the within-session changes in peak N160 amplitude may reflect a habituation-like response to the test environment.