Frank S M, Shir Y, Raja S N, Fleisher L A, Beattie C
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287.
Anesthesiology. 1994 Mar;80(3):502-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00005.
Inadvertent hypothermia occurs frequently during surgery and may be associated with adverse outcomes. Although various anesthetic agents have been shown to impair thermoregulation, the impairment with regional and general anesthetics has not been directly compared.
Thirty patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were randomly allocated to receive epidural (EA, n = 15) or general (GA, n = 15) anesthesia. Tympanic membrane measurements were used to assess core temperature. Forearm and calf skin-surface temperature gradients were used to assess thermoregulatory vasoconstriction (forearm minus fingertip > 4 degrees C and calf minus toe > 6 degrees C). The two groups were compared during the intraoperative and early postoperative periods to identify differences. Subgroup analysis was used to compare core temperatures and skin-surface gradients in younger (< 62 yr of age) and older (> or = 62 yr) patients in the EA and GA groups.
Mean tympanic membrane temperatures were similar at all time periods in the EA and GA groups and were nearly identical at the end of the surgical procedure (EA, 35.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C; GA, 35.6 +/- 0.2 degrees C) (P = 0.68). Intraoperatively, the EA group maintained a significant forearm skin-surface gradient compared to the GA group (P = 0.0001), whereas the calf gradients were minimal and were similar between groups. Postoperatively, both groups had comparable positive forearm gradients, whereas calf gradients were greater in the GA group (P = 0.001). Mean core temperatures and forearm gradients were not different between the younger and older patients receiving GA. In those receiving EA, the younger patients had greater mean core temperatures (P = 0.015) and greater forearm gradients (P = 0.05) for most of the perioperative period.
The EA and GA groups had virtually identical core temperature profiles during the intraoperative and post-operative periods. Comparison of skin-surface gradients suggests that EA is associated with less intraoperative upper-body thermoregulatory impairment but greater and persistent post-operative lower-body impairment. During EA, younger patients appeared to maintain thermoregulatory activity relative to the older patients. In patients receiving GA, the age-related differences were minimal.
术中意外低温频繁发生,且可能与不良结局相关。尽管已证实多种麻醉药物会损害体温调节功能,但区域麻醉和全身麻醉的损害作用尚未直接比较。
30例行耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的患者被随机分配接受硬膜外麻醉(EA组,n = 15)或全身麻醉(GA组,n = 15)。采用鼓膜温度测量评估核心体温。通过前臂和小腿皮肤表面温度梯度评估体温调节性血管收缩(前臂温度减去指尖温度>4℃,小腿温度减去足趾温度>6℃)。比较两组患者术中及术后早期的情况以确定差异。亚组分析用于比较EA组和GA组中年轻(<62岁)和年长(≥62岁)患者的核心体温及皮肤表面梯度。
EA组和GA组在所有时间段的平均鼓膜温度相似,手术结束时几乎相同(EA组,35.5±0.2℃;GA组,35.6±0.2℃)(P = 0.68)。术中,与GA组相比,EA组前臂皮肤表面梯度显著(P = 0.0001),而小腿梯度最小且两组间相似。术后,两组前臂的正向梯度相当,而GA组小腿梯度更大(P = 0.001)。接受GA的年轻和年长患者的平均核心体温及前臂梯度无差异。接受EA的患者中,年轻患者在围手术期的大部分时间平均核心体温更高(P = 0.015),前臂梯度更大(P = 0.05)。
EA组和GA组在术中和术后的核心体温曲线几乎相同。皮肤表面梯度比较表明,EA与术中上身体温调节损害较小相关,但与术后下身更大且持续的损害相关。在EA期间,年轻患者相对于年长患者似乎能维持体温调节活动。在接受GA的患者中,与年龄相关的差异最小。