Sennwald G R, Schaub P
Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1993;86(4):265-71.
We reviewed fourteen patients suffering from thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). This allowed a critical analysis of the diagnostic tools, especially the Adson and Allen tests, currently used. The value of arthrography and phlebography are discussed in relation to the supposed pathophysiology of the disease. The decision to operate on those patients has to be considered in relation to the possible mishaps related to the surgical procedure. Particular attention has to be paid to post-operative perineural fibrosis, a possible cause of definite disability. The psychological components seem to remain mostly underestimated, a fact that has to be stressed and which we were able to demonstrate in our small sample. However, pre-operative evaluation remains difficult. No definite objective sign enables the surgeon to assert the presence of a thoracic outlet syndrome. Therefore not only the decision making but also the analysis of the results remains debatable. In all cases, even in the presence of clear narrowing of the vessels, indication to operation should be restrictive.
我们回顾了14例患有胸廓出口综合征(TOS)的患者。这使得对目前使用的诊断工具,尤其是阿德森试验和艾伦试验进行批判性分析成为可能。结合该疾病假定的病理生理学讨论了关节造影和静脉造影的价值。对于这些患者的手术决策必须考虑到与手术相关的可能并发症。必须特别注意术后神经周围纤维化,这是导致明确残疾的一个可能原因。心理因素似乎大多仍被低估,这一事实必须予以强调,而且我们能够在我们的小样本中证实这一点。然而,术前评估仍然困难。没有明确的客观体征能使外科医生确定胸廓出口综合征的存在。因此,不仅决策过程,而且结果分析都存在争议。在所有情况下,即使存在明显的血管狭窄,手术指征也应严格掌握。