Forss H, Saarni U M, Seppä L
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;22(1):21-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01563.x.
In recent years, the interest in the use of glass-ionomer materials as fissure sealants has increased. The aim of this study was to compare the retention and caries-preventive effect of glass-ionomer (Fuji III) and resin-based light-cured (Delton) fissure sealants. Three health center dentists applied the sealants to 166 children; glass-ionomer sealants on one side and resin-based sealants on the contralateral side of the mouth. After 2 yr, one pair of molar teeth in the mouths of 151 children was compared. Twenty-six percent of glass-ionomer and 82% of resin-based sealants were totally present (P < 0.001). During the 2 yr, in both groups 4.6% of the sealed surfaces became carious. The results show that the retention of glass-ionomer sealants is markedly inferior to the resin-based sealants. In this study, however, no difference in caries increment on the sealed surfaces was observed. This may be due to the different mechanism of caries prevention for the sealant materials, or to the overall low caries activity of the participants.
近年来,人们对使用玻璃离子材料作为窝沟封闭剂的兴趣有所增加。本研究的目的是比较玻璃离子(富士III型)和树脂基光固化(德尔顿)窝沟封闭剂的保留率和防龋效果。三名健康中心的牙医为166名儿童应用了封闭剂;在口腔一侧使用玻璃离子封闭剂,对侧使用树脂基封闭剂。2年后,对151名儿童口腔中的一对磨牙进行了比较。26%的玻璃离子封闭剂和82%的树脂基封闭剂完全留存(P<0.001)。在这2年期间,两组中4.6%的封闭表面发生了龋坏。结果表明,玻璃离子封闭剂的保留率明显低于树脂基封闭剂。然而,在本研究中,未观察到封闭表面龋坏增量的差异。这可能是由于封闭剂材料的防龋机制不同,或者是由于参与者总体龋活性较低。