Suppr超能文献

一次性应用复合树脂和玻璃离子封闭剂5年后的防龋效果

Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.

作者信息

Beiruti N, Frencken J E, van't Hof M A, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman W H

机构信息

Regional WHO Demonstration, Training and Research Centre for Oral Health, Damascus, Syria.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2006;40(1):52-9. doi: 10.1159/000088907.

Abstract

The aim of the present trial was to (1) compare the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer sealants, placed according to the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) procedure, with composite resin sealants over time and (2) investigate the caries-preventive effect after complete disappearance of sealant material. Forty-six boys and 57 girls, mean age 7.8 years, were randomly divided into two treatment groups in a parallel-group study design. A light-polymerized composite resin sealant material and a high-viscosity glass ionomer were each placed in 180 fully erupted first molars in their respective treatment groups. Evaluation took place annually for 5 years by calibrated examiners. After 5 years, 86% composite resin and 88% glass ionomer sealants did not survive. Three categories of re-exposure periods for caries development in pits and fissures after complete loss of sealants were distinguished: 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3 years. In the 2- to 3-year group, 13 and 3% of pits and fissures previously sealed with composite resin and glass ionomer, respectively, were diagnosed as having developed a dentine lesion. The relative risks (95% CI) of dentine lesion development in surfaces sealed with glass ionomer compared to those sealed with composite resin after 3, 4 and 5 years were 0.22 (0.06-0.82), 0.32 (0.14-0.73) and 0.28 (0.13-0.61), respectively. The relative risks of dentine lesion development in pits and fissures previously sealed with glass ionomer compared with composite resin over re-exposure periods of 1-2 and 2-3 years were 0.26 (0.14-0.48) and 0.25 (0.09-0.68), respectively. We conclude that the caries-preventive effect of high-viscosity glass ionomer sealants, placed using the ART procedure, was between 3.1 and 4.5 times higher than that of composite resin sealants after 3-5 years. Furthermore, high-viscosity (ART) glass ionomer sealants appear to have a four times higher chance of preventing caries development in re-exposed pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces in first molars than light-cured composite resin sealant material over a 1- to 3-year period. A well-designed clinical trial using different types of oral health personnel should be implemented to confirm these initial results.

摘要

本试验的目的是

(1)比较按照非创伤性修复治疗(ART)程序放置的玻璃离子封闭剂与复合树脂封闭剂随时间推移的防龋效果;(2)研究封闭剂材料完全消失后的防龋效果。在一项平行组研究设计中,将46名男孩和57名女孩(平均年龄7.8岁)随机分为两个治疗组。在各自治疗组中,将一种光固化复合树脂封闭剂材料和一种高粘度玻璃离子分别放置在180颗完全萌出的第一恒磨牙上。由经过校准的检查人员每年进行评估,持续5年。5年后,86%的复合树脂封闭剂和88%的玻璃离子封闭剂未能留存。区分了封闭剂完全丧失后窝沟龋发展的三类再暴露期:0 - 1年、1 - 2年和2 - 3年。在2至3年组中,先前用复合树脂和玻璃离子封闭的窝沟分别有13%和3%被诊断为出现了牙本质病变。3年、4年和5年后,与用复合树脂封闭的表面相比,用玻璃离子封闭的表面发生牙本质病变的相对风险(95%CI)分别为0.22(0.06 - 0.82)、0.32(0.14 - 0.73)和0.28(0.13 - 0.61)。在1 - 2年和2 - 3年的再暴露期内,与复合树脂相比,先前用玻璃离子封闭的窝沟发生牙本质病变的相对风险分别为0.26(0.14 - 0.48)和0.25(0.09 - 0.68)。我们得出结论,在3 - 5年后,使用ART程序放置的高粘度玻璃离子封闭剂的防龋效果比复合树脂封闭剂高3.1至4.5倍。此外,在1至3年的时间里,高粘度(ART)玻璃离子封闭剂在预防第一恒磨牙咬合面再暴露窝沟龋发展方面的可能性似乎比光固化复合树脂封闭剂材料高四倍。应开展一项使用不同类型口腔卫生人员的精心设计的临床试验来证实这些初步结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验