Suppr超能文献

Clinical evaluation of a portable ultrasonic and a standard optical pachometer.

作者信息

Patel S, Stevenson R W

机构信息

Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Jan;71(1):43-6. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199401000-00009.

Abstract

The clinical performance of a portable ultrasonic pachometer was compared with a modified optical pachometer on a group of normal subjects. The mean central corneal thickness according to optical pachometry using the "edge-to-edge" method of optical doubling was 0.553 mm (SD = +/- 0.022). The mean central corneal thickness using the ultrasonic device was 0.506 mm (SD = +/- 0.039). The differences between the means was statistically significant (at 1% level of probability). Based on the light distribution within the corneal optical section viewed during optical pachometry a hypothesis is derived supporting the notion that optical pachometry tends to overestimate corneal thickness rather than ultrasonic pachometry underestimating corneal thickness.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of a portable ultrasonic and a standard optical pachometer.
Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Jan;71(1):43-6. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199401000-00009.
3
Method of evaluating ultrasonic pachometers.
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Jun;63(6):462-6. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198606000-00011.
9
A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry.光学法眼压测量与超声法眼压测量的临床比较
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991 Oct;69(5):659-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04857.x.
10
Variability of ultrasonic pachometry.超声角膜测厚法的变异性
Optom Vis Sci. 1990 Mar;67(3):162-5. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199003000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验