Imdahl A, Bräutigam P, Hauenstein K H, Eggstein S, Waninger J, Farthmann E H
Abteilung Allgemeine Chirurgie mit Poliklinik, Universität Freiburg.
Zentralbl Chir. 1994;119(1):17-22.
The importance of the CEA-immunoscintigraphy (IS; BW 431/26 Fa Behring) for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and its metastases was determined in a prospective trial including 60 patients. The results were compared with results of the ultrasound, the CT-Scan and the Angio-CT. Patients suffered from a colorectal carcinoma (15), from a local tumor recurrence after bowel resection (10), from hepatic (39) and/or extrahepatic metastases (16). In 40 patients the diagnosis was confirmed by laparotomy. Regarding the detection of hepatic metastases the sensitivity and specificity of the Angio-CT were superior to the IS (0.86 and 0.63 vs. 0.78 and 0.45). Ultrasound and Angio-CT together revealed true positive results in 89.2%. The IS did not improve this rate. Regarding the detection of extrahepatic metastases the sensitivity and the specificity of the CT were slightly superior to the IS (0.59 and 0.87 vs. 0.47 and 0.28). However, the IS increased the rate of true positive results by 18.8% (US + CT 43.7%; +IS 62.5% true positive results). Due to these results the IS is not recommended as the method of choice to detect liver metastases. But in patients unfit for diagnostic laparotomy the IS may give additional information of the extrahepatic tumor stage.
在一项纳入60例患者的前瞻性试验中,确定了癌胚抗原免疫闪烁扫描(IS;百林公司的BW 431/26)对于结直肠癌及其转移灶诊断的重要性。将结果与超声、CT扫描及血管造影CT的结果进行了比较。患者患有结直肠癌(15例)、肠切除术后局部肿瘤复发(10例)、肝转移(39例)和/或肝外转移(16例)。40例患者通过剖腹手术确诊。关于肝转移灶的检测,血管造影CT的敏感性和特异性优于免疫闪烁扫描(分别为0.86和0.63,而免疫闪烁扫描为0.78和0.45)。超声和血管造影CT联合检测的真阳性率为89.2%。免疫闪烁扫描未提高该比率。关于肝外转移灶的检测,CT的敏感性和特异性略优于免疫闪烁扫描(分别为0.59和0.87,而免疫闪烁扫描为0.47和0.28)。然而,免疫闪烁扫描使真阳性率提高了18.8%(超声+CT的真阳性率为43.7%;+免疫闪烁扫描为62.5%)。基于这些结果,不推荐将免疫闪烁扫描作为检测肝转移灶的首选方法。但对于不适合进行诊断性剖腹手术的患者,免疫闪烁扫描可能会提供有关肝外肿瘤分期的额外信息。