Cannon R O, Tripodi D, Dilsizian V, Panza J A, Fananapazir L
Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;73(8):571-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90336-0.
Because dual-chamber (DDD) pacing has been shown to be of benefit regarding symptoms, rest and pacing hemodynamics, and exercise duration in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC), the effect of DDD pacing was assessed in patients with nonobstructive HC who were significantly symptomatic despite medical management. Echocardiography, treadmill exercise testing, thallium-201 scintigraphy, radionuclide angiography, and invasive measurement of rest and semi-erect bicycle exercise hemodynamics were performed in 12 patients before and approximately 4 months after permanent DDD pacing. One patient died 3 months after pacemaker implantation, because of worsening diastolic heart failure. Of the remaining 11 patients, 10 improved regarding symptoms, and treadmill exercise duration was longer during DDD pacing than during the baseline study in sinus rhythm (6.8 +/- 2.8 to 8.5 +/- 2.8 minutes; p < 0.01), with a significant increase in the peak double product achieved (28.9 +/- 6.1 to 31.0 +/- 6.8 x 10(3); p < 0.05). However, there were significant reductions in cardiac (3.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.1 +/- 0.5 ml/min/m2; p < 0.01) and stroke volume (47.4 +/- 11.4 to 38.7 +/- 6.5 ml/beat/m2; p < 0.01) indexes, and a trend toward reduction in submaximal stroke volume index during DDD pacing as compared with the baseline study in sinus rhythm (44.7 +/- 13.5 to 40.9 +/- 10.9 ml/beat/m2; p = 0.097). No change in peak heart rate, cardiac or stroke volume index, mean blood pressure, or pulmonary artery or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure occurred with peak exercise during DDD pacing as compared with the initial exercise study in sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
由于双腔(DDD)起搏已被证明对梗阻性肥厚型心肌病(HC)患者的症状、静息状态、起搏血流动力学及运动持续时间有益,因此我们评估了DDD起搏对尽管接受药物治疗但仍有明显症状的非梗阻性HC患者的疗效。对12例患者在永久DDD起搏前及起搏后约4个月进行了超声心动图、平板运动试验、铊-201心肌显像、放射性核素血管造影以及静息和半直立自行车运动时的有创血流动力学测量。1例患者在起搏器植入后3个月因舒张性心力衰竭恶化死亡。其余11例患者中,10例症状改善,DDD起搏时平板运动持续时间比窦性心律基线研究时更长(6.8±2.8分钟至8.5±2.8分钟;p<0.01),达到的峰值双乘积显著增加(28.9±6.1至31.0±6.8×10³;p<0.05)。然而,心脏指数(3.7±0.9至3.1±0.5 ml/min/m²;p<0.01)和每搏量指数(47.4±11.4至38.7±6.5 ml/搏/m²;p<0.01)显著降低,与窦性心律基线研究相比,DDD起搏时次极量每搏量指数有降低趋势(44.7±13.5至40.9±10.9 ml/搏/m²;p = 0.097)。与窦性心律初始运动研究相比,DDD起搏时峰值运动时的峰值心率、心脏或每搏量指数、平均血压、肺动脉或肺毛细血管楔压均无变化。(摘要截断于250字)