Arch Bronconeumol. 1994 Jan;30(1):40-8.
After its formation in 1991, the Lung Cancer Task Force of the Spanish Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Society (SEPAR) wrote a list of Spanish research priorities as a basis for future multi-center studies.
The Executive Committee took into consideration the contributions of Task Force members in writing four survey questionnaires. Survey 1: "Ways of studying, treating and coming to decisions about patients with bronchogenic carcinoma." Survey II: "Diagnostic and therapeutic attitudes toward N2." Survey III: "Bronchogenic T3-T4 carcinoma." Survey IV: Postoperative assessment in bronchogenic carcinoma." Forty-seven, 43, 35 and 42 replies, respectively, were received. Analysis of evaluable replies provide the basis of the results.
Survey I: The 47 replies came from 32 hospitals; 21 also sent copies of their diagnostic-therapeutic protocols, revealing 19 different models for clinical use (17) or research (2). SURVEY II: X-rays and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax are the non-invasive procedures used by most of the respondents (39 or 95%). Mediastinoscopy is indicated selectively according to 32 (78%) and routinely according to 7 (17%). Twenty-eight (68%) respondents confirm N2 X-rays histologically and 9 (22%) resort immediately to surgery. Five (12%) exclude from surgery any N1 found by mediastinoscopy or mediastinotomy, while the others may exclude such patients depending on histological type, number and location of ganglia and type of mediastinal involvement. After induction chemotherapy in patients excluded from surgery, 24 (59%) may restore eligibility if some form of remission is observed. If N2 is found during thoracotomy, 25 respondents (61%) follow with pulmonary resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy, although they first take into account mainly patient operability, likelihood of a complete resection, tissue type, invasion of the gangliar capsule and the number of malignant nodes found. SURVEY III: Twenty-seven, or a 98% majority of the 29 evaluable respondents, said that they would be in favor of a national register of T3-T4 carcinoma, would use a computerized system for recording case histories and would follow a standard therapeutic protocol. All believe that resection of the pleura and the costal wall and intercostal space is useful; slightly more than half believe that it would be useful to extend resection to the trachea and carina, superior vena cava or atrium. Eight (30%), 11 (41%) and 12 (44%) favor resection of the vertebral body, muscle wall of the esophagus and the pulmonary artery, respectively. Twenty-four (83%) place no faith in partial surgery in cases of T3 and T4. SURVEY IV: Thirty (96%) of the 31 thoracic surgeons who answered the questionnaire follow their patients after surgery, while only 7 (63%) of the 11 pneumologists do so. Thirty-four (80%) use a postoperative follow-up protocol and 29 (69%) note the tumor-free interval. Twenty-three (54%) make a functional assessment of the patient and 26 (62%) order blood and biochemical work-ups. There is little agreement on the use of tumoral markers and only 6 (14%) do immunological studies occasionally. All use simple chest X-rays routinely; CT, abdominal sonograms and bone gammagrams may be used, depending on clinical data and physical examination. Most (36 or 85%) believe that collaboration on a postoperative protocol for nationwide use would be useful. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
西班牙肺病与胸外科学会(SEPAR)肺癌特别工作组于1991年成立后,制定了一份西班牙研究重点清单,作为未来多中心研究的基础。
1)获取有关支气管源性癌患者诊断、治疗及决策方式的信息;2)确定对伴有同侧纵隔淋巴结肿大(N2)的支气管源性癌的不同态度;3)征求胸外科医生关于参与全国性T3和T4期支气管源性癌协作研究的意见,并获取他们对具体手术问题的看法;4)研究术后监测方案。
执行委员会考虑了特别工作组成员在编写四份调查问卷时的贡献。调查问卷1:“支气管源性癌患者的研究、治疗及决策方式”。调查问卷II:“对N2的诊断和治疗态度”。调查问卷III:“支气管源性T3 - T4期癌”。调查问卷IV:“支气管源性癌的术后评估”。分别收到了47份、43份、35份和42份回复。对可评估回复的分析为结果提供了依据。
调查问卷I:47份回复来自32家医院;21家还发送了其诊断 - 治疗方案副本,揭示了19种不同的临床使用(17种)或研究(2种)模型。调查问卷II:胸部X线和计算机断层扫描(CT)是大多数受访者(39人或95%)使用的非侵入性检查方法。32人(78%)根据情况选择性地进行纵隔镜检查,7人(17%)常规进行。28人(68%)通过组织学确认N2 X线,9人(22%)立即进行手术。5人(12%)将纵隔镜检查或纵隔切开术中发现的任何N1排除在手术之外,而其他人可能根据组织学类型、神经节数量和位置以及纵隔受累类型排除此类患者。对于被排除手术的患者进行诱导化疗后,如果观察到某种形式的缓解,24人(59%)可能恢复手术资格。如果在开胸手术中发现N2,25名受访者(61%)随后进行肺切除和纵隔淋巴结清扫,尽管他们首先主要考虑患者的可手术性、完全切除的可能性、组织类型、神经节包膜侵犯情况以及发现的恶性淋巴结数量。调查问卷III:29名可评估受访者中的27人(98%)表示他们赞成建立T3 - T4期癌的全国登记册,会使用计算机系统记录病历,并会遵循标准治疗方案。所有人都认为切除胸膜、胸壁和肋间空间是有用的;略多于一半的人认为将切除范围扩大到气管和隆突、上腔静脉或心房会有用。8人(30%)、11人(41%)和12人(44%)分别赞成切除椎体、食管肌壁和肺动脉。24人(83%)对T3和T4期病例的部分手术不抱信心。调查问卷IV:回答问卷的31名胸外科医生中有30人(96%)在术后对患者进行随访,而11名肺科医生中只有7人(63%)这样做。34人(80%)使用术后随访方案,29人(69%)记录无瘤间期。23人(54%)对患者进行功能评估,26人(62%)安排血液和生化检查。在肿瘤标志物的使用上几乎没有一致意见;只有6人(14%)偶尔进行免疫学研究。所有人都常规使用简单的胸部X线检查;根据临床数据和体格检查,可能会使用CT、腹部超声和骨闪烁扫描。大多数人(36人或85%)认为制定全国通用的术后方案进行协作会有用。(摘要截断)