• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量头孢吡肟治疗严重细菌感染

Low-dosage cefepime as treatment for serious bacterial infections.

作者信息

Giamarellou H

机构信息

1st Department of Propedeutic Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Greece.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:123-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.123.

DOI:10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.123
PMID:8150755
Abstract

Since infection develops in significant numbers of hospitalized patients, the problem of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is of increasing concern. We evaluated the efficacy of cefepime 1 g bd as treatment for acute, moderately severe bacterial infection in 239 hospitalized patients (mean age 60 years). Of these patients, 204 were evaluated clinically for urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 90), lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (n = 70), skin and soft tissue infection (S/STI) (n = 12) and bacteraemia which was associated with either UTI or LRTI (n = 32) but not included in the previously mentioned UTI and LRTI groups. Amongst the pathogens isolated (36 Gram-positive, 150 Gram-negative), the most predominant species were Escherichia coli in UTI and bacteraemia (n = 81), Streptococcus pneumoniae in LRTI and bacteraemia (n = 23), Haemophilus influenzae in LRTI (n = 16), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4) and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 2) in S/STI. The mean duration of treatment was 8.5 days and was the same for the 204 clinically evaluable patients. Overall, the clinical cure rate for cefepime was 94% (191/204). Pathogen eradication was achieved in 93% (185/199) of infections. Of the patients with associated bacteraemia, the clinical cure rate was 97% (31/32) and 94% (16/17) of the pathogens were eradicated. Cefepime therapy was well-tolerated. Treatment was discontinued in eight patients (3%) because of local intolerance and in five patients (2%) because of drug-related adverse events (rash, headache and pruritus). Cefepime 1 g bd is as safe and effective as other parenteral cephalosporins for the treatment of acute bacterial UTI, LRTI and S/STI, including those cases with associated bacteraemia. The bd dosing schedule and reported lack of cross-resistance with other cephalosporins against some species of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli make cefepime an attractive treatment option in hospitalized patients.

摘要

由于大量住院患者会发生感染,对第三代头孢菌素的耐药问题日益受到关注。我们评估了每日两次静脉滴注1克头孢吡肟治疗239例住院患者(平均年龄60岁)急性、中度严重细菌感染的疗效。在这些患者中,204例接受了临床评估,涉及尿路感染(UTI)(90例)、下呼吸道感染(LRTI)(70例)、皮肤及软组织感染(S/STI)(12例)以及与UTI或LRTI相关的菌血症(32例),但不包括前述UTI和LRTI组中的病例。在分离出的病原体中(36株革兰阳性菌、150株革兰阴性菌),最主要的菌种为UTI和菌血症中的大肠杆菌(81例)、LRTI和菌血症中的肺炎链球菌(23例)、LRTI中的流感嗜血杆菌(16例)、S/STI中的铜绿假单胞菌(4例)和阴沟肠杆菌(2例)。平均治疗疗程为8.5天,204例可进行临床评估的患者疗程相同。总体而言,头孢吡肟的临床治愈率为94%(191/204)。93%(185/199)的感染实现了病原体清除。在伴有菌血症的患者中,临床治愈率为97%((31/32),94%(16/17)的病原体被清除。头孢吡肟治疗耐受性良好。8例患者(3%)因局部不耐受停药,5例患者(2%)因药物相关不良事件(皮疹、头痛和瘙痒)停药。每日两次静脉滴注1克头孢吡肟治疗急性细菌性UTI、LRTI和S/STI,包括伴有菌血症的病例,与其他肠外头孢菌素一样安全有效。每日两次给药方案以及报道的与其他头孢菌素对某些需氧革兰阴性杆菌菌种不存在交叉耐药性,使头孢吡肟成为住院患者有吸引力的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Low-dosage cefepime as treatment for serious bacterial infections.低剂量头孢吡肟治疗严重细菌感染
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:123-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.123.
2
A non-comparative, multicentre study of cefepime in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:133-40. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.133.
3
A non-comparative study of the efficacy and tolerance of cefepime in combination with amikacin in the treatment of severe infections in patients in intensive care.头孢吡肟联合阿米卡星治疗重症监护患者严重感染的疗效和耐受性的非对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:205-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.205.
4
Clinical applications of a new parenteral antibiotic in the treatment of severe bacterial infections.一种新型胃肠外抗生素在严重细菌感染治疗中的临床应用。
Am J Med. 1996 Jun 24;100(6A):52S-59S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00108-8.
5
International comparative study of cefepime and ceftazidime in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗严重细菌感染的国际比较研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:175-86. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.175.
6
The use of cefepime (BMY 28142) to treat respiratory infections.使用头孢吡肟(BMY 28142)治疗呼吸道感染。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May-Jun;12(3):257-60. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90023-0.
7
Effects of an alternative cefepime dosing strategy in pulmonary and bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a single-center, open-label, prospective, observational study.头孢吡肟替代给药策略对阴沟肠杆菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌所致肺部及血流感染的影响:一项单中心、开放标签、前瞻性观察性研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Feb;31(2):299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.02.015.
8
Cefepime as treatment for osteomyelitis and other severe bacterial infections.头孢吡肟用于治疗骨髓炎及其他严重细菌感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:141-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.141.
9
Treatment of urinary tract infections: selecting an appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic for nosocomial infections.
Am J Med. 1996 Jun 24;100(6A):76S-82S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)00112-x.
10
A multicenter comparative study of cefepime versus broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy in moderate and severe bacterial infections.头孢吡肟与广谱抗菌疗法治疗中重度细菌感染的多中心对照研究。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2002 Oct;6(5):206-18. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702002000500001.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefepime compared with ceftazidime as initial therapy for serious bacterial infections and sepsis syndrome.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶作为严重细菌感染和脓毒症综合征初始治疗的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Mar;38(3):415-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.3.415.
2
Cefepime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.头孢吡肟:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途综述
Drugs. 1994 Mar;47(3):471-505. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199447030-00007.