Shaw D E, Jones H S, Moseley M J
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Birmingham, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Jan;14(1):92-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00566.x.
Method-comparison studies, in which new 'candidate' techniques are compared with an established 'gold standard', feature commonly in optometric research. Investigators often analyse their findings using least squares regression, Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient and the paired t-test. We describe more appropriate methods which include: the 'limits of agreement', the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Deming's method for estimating a straight line fit. Comparisons between methods are made with the aid of a computer simulation. Computer program listings are provided to assist in implementing the analyses.
方法比较研究,即将新的“候选”技术与既定的“金标准”进行比较,在验光研究中很常见。研究人员通常使用最小二乘法回归、皮尔逊积矩相关系数和配对t检验来分析他们的发现。我们描述了更合适的方法,包括:“一致性界限”、组内相关系数以及用于估计直线拟合的戴明方法。借助计算机模拟对不同方法进行比较。提供了计算机程序清单以协助进行分析。