Martignat L, Feve B, Ouary M, Pogu S, Charbonnel B, Saï P
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immuno-Endocrinology, University School of Medicine, Nantes, France.
J Autoimmun. 1993 Dec;6(6):753-69. doi: 10.1006/jaut.1993.1062.
As compared to several strains of control mice, NOD mice displayed an increased number (P < 10(-4)) of splenocytes binding in vitro to xenogeneic rat RIN cells or hamster HIT cells, but not to nine non-beta cell lines. The increased binding to RIN cells was abolished by competition with RIN membrane extracts. It was prevented by depletion of Thy 1-2+ splenocytes, and by blocking the T-cell receptor (TCR) complex with anti-CD3 MoAbs, anti-alpha/beta TCR MoAbs, or their F(ab)'2 fragments (P < 10(-3)), but not with anti-gamma/delta TCR MoAbs. Neither anti-V beta 8 nor anti-V beta 6 MoAbs modified the signal. MoAbs against rat MHC class II molecules, but not MoAbs against rat class I molecules, inhibited the increased RIN-adhesion of NOD splenocytes (P < 10(-3)). After 3 h or 8 h of co-incubation, the number of RIN-binding splenocytes was not different between NOD and control mice, and class II molecules were undetectable on RIN cells. Class II+ RIN cells appeared after 20 h of coculture when the increased binding was also observed. When 10,000 rad-irradiated RIN cells were used for the co-incubations, neither class II+ RIN cells nor the increased binding of NOD splenocytes were found. As revealed by immunofluorescence, MoAbs against rat class II molecules cross-reacted with 30% of NOD (but not of control) splenocytes. Conversely, anti-NOD class II MoAbs (but not MoAbs against non-NOD class II molecules) cross-reacted with 20% of RIN cells coincubated with splenocytes. Thus, despite the species barrier, T-splenocytes from NOD mice display an increased adhesion to xenogeneic beta-cells. This binding involves T splenocytes bearing alpha/beta TCRs and RIN cells induced to express MHC class II molecules. MHC restriction may be completely absent in this phenomenon. Alternatively, the rat class II products may be directly recognized by NOD T cells in a xenograft context, and this model may therefore be useful toward the comprehension of some mechanisms leading to the rejection of islet xenotransplants. Finally, because of a cross-reaction with I-Anod, these rat Class II molecules may also either be directly recognized by I-A autoreactive NOD T cells or present RIN peptides to NOD alpha/beta TCRs, and thus would be relevant to the debated ability of beta cells to function as antigen-presenting cells.
与几种对照小鼠品系相比,非肥胖糖尿病(NOD)小鼠的脾细胞在体外与异种大鼠RIN细胞或仓鼠HIT细胞结合的数量增加(P < 10^(-4)),但与9种非β细胞系结合的数量未增加。与RIN细胞膜提取物竞争可消除与RIN细胞结合的增加。用抗Thy 1-2+脾细胞耗竭法以及用抗CD3单克隆抗体、抗α/βT细胞受体(TCR)单克隆抗体或其F(ab)'2片段阻断T细胞受体复合物(P < 10^(-3))可阻止这种结合,但用抗γ/δTCR单克隆抗体则无法阻止。抗Vβ8和抗Vβ6单克隆抗体均未改变该信号。抗大鼠MHCⅡ类分子的单克隆抗体可抑制NOD脾细胞与RIN细胞结合增加(P < 10^(-3)),而抗大鼠Ⅰ类分子的单克隆抗体则无此作用。共孵育3小时或8小时后,NOD小鼠和对照小鼠中与RIN细胞结合的脾细胞数量无差异,且RIN细胞上未检测到Ⅱ类分子。共培养20小时后出现Ⅱ类+ RIN细胞,此时也观察到结合增加。当用10000拉德照射的RIN细胞进行共孵育时,既未发现Ⅱ类+ RIN细胞,也未发现NOD脾细胞结合增加。免疫荧光显示,抗大鼠Ⅱ类分子的单克隆抗体与30%的NOD(而非对照)脾细胞发生交叉反应。相反,抗NODⅡ类单克隆抗体(而非抗非NODⅡ类分子的单克隆抗体)与与脾细胞共孵育的20%的RIN细胞发生交叉反应。因此,尽管存在种属屏障,NOD小鼠的T脾细胞对异种β细胞的黏附增加。这种结合涉及带有α/βTCR的T脾细胞和被诱导表达MHCⅡ类分子的RIN细胞。在这种现象中可能完全不存在MHC限制。或者,大鼠Ⅱ类产物可能在异种移植环境中被NOD T细胞直接识别,因此该模型可能有助于理解导致胰岛异种移植排斥的一些机制。最后,由于与I-A_Nod发生交叉反应,这些大鼠Ⅱ类分子也可能被I-A自身反应性NOD T细胞直接识别,或者将RIN肽呈递给NODα/βTCR,因此与β细胞作为抗原呈递细胞的争议能力相关。